Deliberative Participation in Constitutional Development of Russia: Theoretical Aspects and Historical Retrospect

E. V. Razdyakonova
{"title":"Deliberative Participation in Constitutional Development of Russia: Theoretical Aspects and Historical Retrospect","authors":"E. V. Razdyakonova","doi":"10.18572/1812-3805-2023-5-15-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the theoretical aspects of deliberative democracy, provides a historical analysis of the use of deliberative forms of democracy when discussing important issues of social and political life. It is emphasized that in the context of digitalization and informatization, the expansion of the use of deliberative democracy leads to more rational decisions in the field of public administration. As a result, the author made a conclusion about the legitimacy of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 2020, provided by the all-Russian vote as opposed to the “sham” and “formality” of the nationwide discussion of the constitutional changes of the Soviet period.","PeriodicalId":302886,"journal":{"name":"History of state and law","volume":"1 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of state and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3805-2023-5-15-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article considers the theoretical aspects of deliberative democracy, provides a historical analysis of the use of deliberative forms of democracy when discussing important issues of social and political life. It is emphasized that in the context of digitalization and informatization, the expansion of the use of deliberative democracy leads to more rational decisions in the field of public administration. As a result, the author made a conclusion about the legitimacy of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 2020, provided by the all-Russian vote as opposed to the “sham” and “formality” of the nationwide discussion of the constitutional changes of the Soviet period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯宪政发展中的协商参与:理论思考与历史回顾
本文考虑了协商民主的理论方面,在讨论社会和政治生活的重要问题时,对民主的协商形式的使用进行了历史分析。强调在数字化、信息化背景下,协商民主运用的扩大导致公共行政领域的决策更加理性。因此,作者对2020年俄罗斯联邦宪法修正案的合法性作出了结论,这是由全俄罗斯人投票提供的,而不是苏联时期全国范围内讨论宪法修改的“虚假”和“形式”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Basic Conventional Values and Narratives in the Legal Culture of Israel The Principle of Legality in the Theory of Lawmaking Activity (from the Second Half of the 20th Century to the Early 21st Century) Medieval Polity: The Real in the Unreal R. Pound’s Ideas on Legal Proof Patterns and the Modern Era Legal Education in Byzantium in the 6th to the 15th Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1