Terminality Advance Directives and Nursing Practice in Brazil: Bioethical Issues

Jacqueline Resende Boaventura, Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia, Ana Paula Da Silva, Luciana Ferreira Da Silva, L. D. S. Barcelos, Carlos Eduardo Pereira Furlani, A. M. Ferreira
{"title":"Terminality Advance Directives and Nursing Practice in Brazil: Bioethical Issues","authors":"Jacqueline Resende Boaventura, Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia, Ana Paula Da Silva, Luciana Ferreira Da Silva, L. D. S. Barcelos, Carlos Eduardo Pereira Furlani, A. M. Ferreira","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advance directives (ADs) are understood as the act of deciding what care the patient wants to receive in the period before death. Preserving the patient’s autonomy by choosing his care guarantees human dignity during the process of dying. In Brazil, life expectancy and supportive technologies have increased, leading to growth of the number of terminally ill patients. However, there is still no legislation regulating ADs causing legal uncertainty in health professionals. Nursing professionals have the support of the Federal Nursing Council to respect the ADs, but, because it is an issue little explored, nursing professionals do not feel safe in the use of ADs, and changes in the curricula of the undergraduate courses in nursing are extremely needed, ensuring that patients have their wishes met during the dying process. Thus, this chapter deals with bioethical and legal issues involving ADs and nursing in the Brazilian context, proposing to deepen reflection and criticism on the issue and subsidies for decision-making.","PeriodicalId":421156,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics in Principle and Praxis - Conceptual Foundations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroethics in Principle and Praxis - Conceptual Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advance directives (ADs) are understood as the act of deciding what care the patient wants to receive in the period before death. Preserving the patient’s autonomy by choosing his care guarantees human dignity during the process of dying. In Brazil, life expectancy and supportive technologies have increased, leading to growth of the number of terminally ill patients. However, there is still no legislation regulating ADs causing legal uncertainty in health professionals. Nursing professionals have the support of the Federal Nursing Council to respect the ADs, but, because it is an issue little explored, nursing professionals do not feel safe in the use of ADs, and changes in the curricula of the undergraduate courses in nursing are extremely needed, ensuring that patients have their wishes met during the dying process. Thus, this chapter deals with bioethical and legal issues involving ADs and nursing in the Brazilian context, proposing to deepen reflection and criticism on the issue and subsidies for decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临终指示和护理实践在巴西:生物伦理问题
预先指示(ADs)被理解为决定患者在死亡前一段时间内想要接受何种护理的行为。通过选择自己的护理方式来保护病人的自主权,保证了人在死亡过程中的尊严。在巴西,预期寿命和支持性技术有所增加,导致绝症患者人数增加。然而,仍然没有立法规范广告,导致卫生专业人员在法律上的不确定性。护理专业人员得到联邦护理委员会的支持,尊重ADs,但是,由于这是一个很少被探索的问题,护理专业人员对使用ADs感到不安全,因此非常需要改变护理本科课程的课程,以确保患者在死亡过程中得到他们的愿望。因此,本章讨论了巴西背景下涉及ADs和护理的生物伦理和法律问题,提出了加深对问题和决策补贴的反思和批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Values-Based Medicine (VsBM) and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Terminality Advance Directives and Nursing Practice in Brazil: Bioethical Issues Doing and Being: A Metaphysic of Persons from an Ontology of Action Introductory Chapter: Reconciling Neurobioethics through Nature’s Lens - Metaphysical Determinants of Subjectivity Naturalizing Neuroethics? A Syncretic Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1