Польский вопрос в дискурсе российской дореволюционной общественной мысли

М. С. Белоусов, Я. С. Абдуллаев, В. А. Чикина
{"title":"Польский вопрос в дискурсе российской дореволюционной общественной мысли","authors":"М. С. Белоусов, Я. С. Абдуллаев, В. А. Чикина","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2019-10-328-346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An attempt is made to reveal the key elements of the discourse of ethnic diversity management in Russian pre-revolutionary social thought. Numerous texts published by representatives of various sociopolitical views (Westerners, Slavophiles, liberals, conservatives, populists and socialists) devoted to the description and assessment of the policy of the Russian government in relation to national regions in the period under review are analyzed. The study was conducted on the basis of the analysis of mainly English-language scientific literature. Poland was chosen as a model region, that is, the main attention in the article is focused on the Polish question. The choice of this national outskirts is due to the following: on the one hand, it compelled the most close attention of representatives of the Russian pre-revolutionary social movement, and on the other, this territory was the place of testing of various incorporation practices by the Russian government. The study showed that, despite different political views and ideological platforms, Russian intellectuals clearly defined the intentions of the authorities, which consisted in the gradual integration of the periphery into the common imperial space, first on the administrative-legal, and then the cultural field. It is shown that the undulating nature of this process was absolutely opportunistic.","PeriodicalId":190169,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyy dialog","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyy dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2019-10-328-346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An attempt is made to reveal the key elements of the discourse of ethnic diversity management in Russian pre-revolutionary social thought. Numerous texts published by representatives of various sociopolitical views (Westerners, Slavophiles, liberals, conservatives, populists and socialists) devoted to the description and assessment of the policy of the Russian government in relation to national regions in the period under review are analyzed. The study was conducted on the basis of the analysis of mainly English-language scientific literature. Poland was chosen as a model region, that is, the main attention in the article is focused on the Polish question. The choice of this national outskirts is due to the following: on the one hand, it compelled the most close attention of representatives of the Russian pre-revolutionary social movement, and on the other, this territory was the place of testing of various incorporation practices by the Russian government. The study showed that, despite different political views and ideological platforms, Russian intellectuals clearly defined the intentions of the authorities, which consisted in the gradual integration of the periphery into the common imperial space, first on the administrative-legal, and then the cultural field. It is shown that the undulating nature of this process was absolutely opportunistic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯革命前社会思想话语中的波兰问题
本文试图揭示俄国革命前社会思想中民族多样性管理话语的关键要素。各种社会政治观点(西方人、斯拉夫主义者、自由派、保守派、民粹主义者和社会主义者)的代表发表的大量文本,致力于描述和评估俄罗斯政府在审查期间与民族地区有关的政策。这项研究主要是在分析英语科学文献的基础上进行的。波兰被选为样板地区,也就是说,本文主要关注的是波兰问题。之所以选择这个国家的郊区,是因为:一方面,它引起了俄国革命前社会运动的代表们最密切的注意;另一方面,这片土地是俄国政府检验各种合并做法的地方。研究表明,尽管政治观点和意识形态平台不同,但俄罗斯知识分子清楚地界定了当局的意图,这包括逐步将外围纳入共同的帝国空间,首先是行政-法律领域,然后是文化领域。结果表明,这一过程的波动性质绝对是机会主义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Linguistic Means of Expressing Objective Epistemic Modality in Scientific Discourse Activities of Provincial Medical Inspectors in Western Siberia in the Late XIX - Early XX Centuries Cross-Cultural Communication: Its Asymmetry and Authenticity Development of Prepositional-Nominal Combination of a Noun in Modern Russian: Analytics in Grammatical System of Russian Language Образование как инструмент российской «мягкой силы» в российско-монгольских отношениях в конце ХХ - начале ХХI веков
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1