Maximising the information gained from an experimental analysis of code inspection and static analysis for concurrent java components

M. A. Wojcicki, P. Strooper
{"title":"Maximising the information gained from an experimental analysis of code inspection and static analysis for concurrent java components","authors":"M. A. Wojcicki, P. Strooper","doi":"10.1145/1159733.1159761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of empirical studies are limited to particular contexts, difficult to generalise and the studies themselves are expensive to perform. Despite these problems, empirical studies in software engineering can be made effective and they are important to both researchers and practitioners. The key to their effectiveness lies in the maximisation of the information that can be gained by examining existing studies, conducting power analyses for an accurate minimum sample size and benefiting from previous studies through replication. This approach was applied in a controlled experiment examining the combination of automated static analysis tools and code inspection in the context of verification and validation (V&V) of concurrent Java components. The combination of these V&V technologies was shown to be cost-effective despite the size of the study, which thus contributes to research in V&V technology evaluation.","PeriodicalId":201305,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The results of empirical studies are limited to particular contexts, difficult to generalise and the studies themselves are expensive to perform. Despite these problems, empirical studies in software engineering can be made effective and they are important to both researchers and practitioners. The key to their effectiveness lies in the maximisation of the information that can be gained by examining existing studies, conducting power analyses for an accurate minimum sample size and benefiting from previous studies through replication. This approach was applied in a controlled experiment examining the combination of automated static analysis tools and code inspection in the context of verification and validation (V&V) of concurrent Java components. The combination of these V&V technologies was shown to be cost-effective despite the size of the study, which thus contributes to research in V&V technology evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最大化从代码检查的实验分析和并发java组件的静态分析中获得的信息
实证研究的结果局限于特定的背景,难以概括,而且研究本身的执行成本很高。尽管存在这些问题,但软件工程中的实证研究是有效的,对研究人员和实践者都很重要。其有效性的关键在于通过检查现有研究,进行准确的最小样本量的功效分析以及通过复制从以前的研究中获益,可以获得最大限度的信息。在并发Java组件的验证和确认(V&V)环境中,该方法被应用于一个受控实验中,该实验检查了自动静态分析工具和代码检查的组合。尽管研究的规模不大,但这些V&V技术的组合被证明具有成本效益,从而有助于V&V技术评估的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An empirical study of developers views on software reuse in statoil ASA Agile customer engagement: a longitudinal qualitative case study Evaluating advantages of test driven development: a controlled experiment with professionals Evaluating guidelines for empirical software engineering studies Maximising the information gained from an experimental analysis of code inspection and static analysis for concurrent java components
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1