A Post-SDG Summit Governance Primer: Interlinking the Institutional, Peace and Justice Dimensions of SDG16 (2016–2019)

P. K. Blind
{"title":"A Post-SDG Summit Governance Primer: Interlinking the Institutional, Peace and Justice Dimensions of SDG16 (2016–2019)","authors":"P. K. Blind","doi":"10.18356/ac569614-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development enters its fifth year of implementation, it is opportune to ask how governance is understood and implemented around the world. In fact, one can go further to probe the extent to which governments are cognizant of the principles undergirding effective governance. This paper examines the ways in which governance has been operationalized by countries, major groups and other stakeholders since the first round of Voluntary National Reviews at the High-level Political Forum (HLPF) of 2016. It does this based on the qualitative overview of the Synthesis reports of Voluntary National Reviews (2016–2029), and the quantitative analysis of three SDG databases: Voluntary National Reviews, SDG Good Practices and the SDG Acceleration Actions. It starts with a literature review of the multidimensional concept of governance. The three databases are then scoped through a series of keywords associated with the SDG16 governance targets. It finds that although SDG 16 is catalytic to progress on all other SDGs, its governance dimension does not receive due focus. The article concludes with several action areas to mainstream the governance dimension of SDG16 in sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":308623,"journal":{"name":"UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Working Papers","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18356/ac569614-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development enters its fifth year of implementation, it is opportune to ask how governance is understood and implemented around the world. In fact, one can go further to probe the extent to which governments are cognizant of the principles undergirding effective governance. This paper examines the ways in which governance has been operationalized by countries, major groups and other stakeholders since the first round of Voluntary National Reviews at the High-level Political Forum (HLPF) of 2016. It does this based on the qualitative overview of the Synthesis reports of Voluntary National Reviews (2016–2029), and the quantitative analysis of three SDG databases: Voluntary National Reviews, SDG Good Practices and the SDG Acceleration Actions. It starts with a literature review of the multidimensional concept of governance. The three databases are then scoped through a series of keywords associated with the SDG16 governance targets. It finds that although SDG 16 is catalytic to progress on all other SDGs, its governance dimension does not receive due focus. The article concludes with several action areas to mainstream the governance dimension of SDG16 in sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续发展目标峰会后的治理入门:将可持续发展目标16的体制、和平与正义层面联系起来(2016-2019)
随着2030年可持续发展议程进入实施的第五个年头,我们有必要问一问,在世界各地如何理解和实施治理?事实上,我们可以进一步探究政府在多大程度上认识到有效治理的基本原则。本文考察了自2016年高级别政治论坛(高级别政治论坛)第一轮自愿国家审查以来,各国、主要群体和其他利益攸关方实施治理的方式。该报告基于对《2016-2029年自愿国家审查综合报告》的定性概述,以及对三个可持续发展目标数据库(自愿国家审查、可持续发展目标良好做法和可持续发展目标加速行动)的定量分析。首先是对多维治理概念的文献回顾。然后通过与SDG16治理目标相关的一系列关键字对这三个数据库进行范围界定。报告发现,尽管可持续发展目标16对所有其他可持续发展目标的进展具有催化作用,但其治理维度并未得到应有的关注。文章最后提出了将可持续发展目标16的治理维度纳入可持续发展主流的几个行动领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Insecurity and Well-being What Does the United Nations “say” About Global Agenda? An Exploration of Trends Using Natural Language Processing for Machine Learning How Long Will it Take for LDCs and SIDS to Recover From the Impacts of COVID-19? The COVID-19 Crisis: What Explains Cross-country Differences in the Pandemic’s Short-term Economic Impact? A Post-SDG Summit Governance Primer: Interlinking the Institutional, Peace and Justice Dimensions of SDG16 (2016–2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1