Evaluación de validez convergente y discriminante en tests computarizados de toma de decisiones

Ignacio Acuña, Y. Michelini, Juan Ignacio Guzmán, J. Godoy
{"title":"Evaluación de validez convergente y discriminante en tests computarizados de toma de decisiones","authors":"Ignacio Acuña, Y. Michelini, Juan Ignacio Guzmán, J. Godoy","doi":"10.15689/AP.2017.1603.12952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Assessment of convergent and discriminant validity in computerized decision-making tests The objective of this study was to analyze the convergent and discriminant validity between impulsivity, executive functioning, and decision-making (DM) tests with and without emotional component and and agent centered DM. Through an Instrumental design, 217 participants were evaluated, 64.5% women, between 18 and 30 years of age (M=23.22 ± 2.44). The Principal Component Analysis showed four components that explained 83.88% of variance and grouped the tests as expected. In addition, the correlation study shows that the true DM tests were poorly correlated, suggesting partial convergence between them. No significant correlations were found between true DM testing and DM testing with agent focus, executive function and impulsivity. The results coincide with expectations and previous studies on the subject.","PeriodicalId":177093,"journal":{"name":"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2017.1603.12952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

– Assessment of convergent and discriminant validity in computerized decision-making tests The objective of this study was to analyze the convergent and discriminant validity between impulsivity, executive functioning, and decision-making (DM) tests with and without emotional component and and agent centered DM. Through an Instrumental design, 217 participants were evaluated, 64.5% women, between 18 and 30 years of age (M=23.22 ± 2.44). The Principal Component Analysis showed four components that explained 83.88% of variance and grouped the tests as expected. In addition, the correlation study shows that the true DM tests were poorly correlated, suggesting partial convergence between them. No significant correlations were found between true DM testing and DM testing with agent focus, executive function and impulsivity. The results coincide with expectations and previous studies on the subject.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机决策测试中的收敛和判别效度评估
本研究的目的是分析冲动性、执行功能和决策(DM)测试的收敛效度和区分效度。通过工具设计,评估了217名参与者,其中64.5%为女性,年龄在18至30岁之间(M=23.22±2.44)。主成分分析显示四个成分解释了83.88%的方差,并按预期对测试进行了分组。此外,相关研究表明,真DM检验相关性较差,表明它们之间存在部分收敛。真实DM测试与受试者注意力、执行功能、冲动性之间均无显著相关。研究结果与人们的预期和此前对这一主题的研究不谋而合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Escala de Crenças Gerais Conspiratórias (ECGC): Desenvolvimento e Evidências Psicométricas Adaptação Transcultural de Instrumentos Avaliativos em Cuidados Paliativos: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura O Impacto do Ensino Público e Privado na Memória de Crianças Análise Confirmatória e de Invariância do Inventário de Habilidades Sociais para Situações Terapêuticas Difíceispara o Contexto Clínico Rorschach e Residência Médica: Estudo Prospectivo com Residentes de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1