Intelligentsia and the Church: the Issue of the Correlation of the Ideal and Spiritual in Leadership (late XIX – beginning XX centuries)

F. Gayda
{"title":"Intelligentsia and the Church: the Issue of the Correlation of the Ideal and Spiritual in Leadership (late XIX – beginning XX centuries)","authors":"F. Gayda","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.092-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of the relationship between the intelligentsia and the Church in Russia during the period of large-scale socio-economic and political changes at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries (including the February Revolution of 1917) is considered. The relevance of the study is determined by the recent appearance of works devoted to the perception of the intelligentsia in the church environment. At the same time, the ideas of the intelligentsia about the Church in the scientific literature have not yet been fully disclosed. The study is based on journalism, office work (materials of the Religious-Philosophical Meetings and the St. Petersburg Religious-Philosophical Society), periodicals, and sources of personal origin. It is concluded that during this period, the intelligentsia in its own environment was already considered as a project parallel to the Church, which inevitably endowed the intelligentsia itself with the appropriate features (messiahism, sacrifice, eschatology, the cult of saints). At the same time, it is shown that the primary was not the spiritual, but the social and, in particular, the ideological role of the intelligentsia, which was reflected in the works of the populists (G.I. Uspensky, N.K. Mikhailovsky). It is shown that D.S. Merezhkovsky developed this tradition, but gave the intelligentsia a global and mystical sound. It is noted that the critics of this approach were V.A. Ternavtsev, A.A. Blok and Vyach. Ivanov in the 1900s; these thinkers spoke of the need for the intelligentsia to enter the Church. It is concluded that after the victory of the February Revolution of 1917, the intelligentsia began to implement their own project of transforming the church system on democratic grounds.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.2.092-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of the relationship between the intelligentsia and the Church in Russia during the period of large-scale socio-economic and political changes at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries (including the February Revolution of 1917) is considered. The relevance of the study is determined by the recent appearance of works devoted to the perception of the intelligentsia in the church environment. At the same time, the ideas of the intelligentsia about the Church in the scientific literature have not yet been fully disclosed. The study is based on journalism, office work (materials of the Religious-Philosophical Meetings and the St. Petersburg Religious-Philosophical Society), periodicals, and sources of personal origin. It is concluded that during this period, the intelligentsia in its own environment was already considered as a project parallel to the Church, which inevitably endowed the intelligentsia itself with the appropriate features (messiahism, sacrifice, eschatology, the cult of saints). At the same time, it is shown that the primary was not the spiritual, but the social and, in particular, the ideological role of the intelligentsia, which was reflected in the works of the populists (G.I. Uspensky, N.K. Mikhailovsky). It is shown that D.S. Merezhkovsky developed this tradition, but gave the intelligentsia a global and mystical sound. It is noted that the critics of this approach were V.A. Ternavtsev, A.A. Blok and Vyach. Ivanov in the 1900s; these thinkers spoke of the need for the intelligentsia to enter the Church. It is concluded that after the victory of the February Revolution of 1917, the intelligentsia began to implement their own project of transforming the church system on democratic grounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识分子与教会:领导理想与精神的关系问题(十九世纪末至二十世纪初)
在19 - 20世纪之交的大规模社会经济和政治变革时期(包括1917年的二月革命),知识分子与教会之间的关系问题被考虑。这项研究的相关性是由最近出现的致力于教会环境中知识分子感知的作品决定的。与此同时,在科学文献中,知识分子对教会的看法还没有完全揭示出来。这项研究基于新闻报道、办公室工作(宗教哲学会议和圣彼得堡宗教哲学学会的材料)、期刊和个人来源。结论是,在这一时期,知识分子在其自身环境中已经被视为一个与教会平行的项目,这不可避免地赋予了知识分子本身适当的特征(弥赛亚,牺牲,末世论,圣徒崇拜)。与此同时,它表明,主要的不是精神的,而是社会的,特别是意识形态的知识分子的作用,这反映在民粹主义者的作品中(G.I. Uspensky, N.K. Mikhailovsky)。梅列日科夫斯基发扬了这一传统,但给知识界带来了一种全球性的、神秘的声音。值得注意的是,这种方法的批评者是V.A. Ternavtsev, A.A. Blok和Vyach。20世纪初的伊万诺夫;这些思想家谈到了知识分子进入教会的必要性。结论是1917年二月革命胜利后,知识分子开始在民主的基础上实施他们自己的改造教会制度的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The First Edition of “The Justification of Good” (1897): Contemporaries’ Response. Part 4 The image of Philostratus in the works of K.K. Vaginov: experience of deconstruction “Real Deed of an Artist” and Philosophy of Art: Solovyev – Fyodorov – Chekrygin V.Y. Bryusov, N.F. Fedorov and the Fedorovians of the 1900s-1920s: The Question of Meaning and Goals of Art. Article one. What were Bryusov and Fedorov Arguing about in the House of Yu.P. Bartenev V.I. Lamansky. Historical letters on the attitude of Russian people to their tribesmen. The letter VI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1