Digital Media Discourse on the Blockage of Huawei by the US Government

M. Rashid, Mureeha Khawaja
{"title":"Digital Media Discourse on the Blockage of Huawei by the US Government","authors":"M. Rashid, Mureeha Khawaja","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3627682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this globalized world the more focus of powerful states on economic capabilities for the maintenance of their influence and power in the international arena. In the contemporary world, two economic powers of the world are confronted with each other in the field of a trade war. The US is the number one economy of the world and on the other hand, China is supposed to surpass it. The core resentments of the US about China are ideological and political differences; China’s emerging economy is a potential threat to the US hegemony. Recently Trump administration placed Huawei and 70 of its other affiliations companies in the ‘Entity List’ of the US and the allegations were that Huawei Company is a national security threat for the US. Entity List means that the American companies, which are doing business with Huawei, need licenses on the specific terms applied by the US government. The US trying to lobby against Huawei with other democratic industrial democracies like the UK, Germany, and other European countries that not use Huawei’s 5G equipment. On the other hand, China’s company Huawei is making its own 5G network and dealing to sell it to other mobile companies and the European countries are not seems to stand along with the US in this scenario. Past studies have predicted future trade relations. There are several possible reasons behind the ban of Huawei, escalation of a trade war between China and the US, new taxes on Chinese products by the US government, Made in China 2025, Huawei is a national security threat for the US due to lack of data privacy, China’s profitable business of 5G and rise of nationalistic American behavior over the free trade concept. The purpose of this research is to explore the digital media discourse of the US, UK, and China to identify the reason behind the blockade of Huawei by the US government. News articles selected about the ban of Huawei from the US, UK, and Chinese’s digital news webs. With the help of discourse analysis, this research will analyze the concerning phenomenon. The expected results are that Huawei is a national security threat for the U.S.","PeriodicalId":107878,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3627682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this globalized world the more focus of powerful states on economic capabilities for the maintenance of their influence and power in the international arena. In the contemporary world, two economic powers of the world are confronted with each other in the field of a trade war. The US is the number one economy of the world and on the other hand, China is supposed to surpass it. The core resentments of the US about China are ideological and political differences; China’s emerging economy is a potential threat to the US hegemony. Recently Trump administration placed Huawei and 70 of its other affiliations companies in the ‘Entity List’ of the US and the allegations were that Huawei Company is a national security threat for the US. Entity List means that the American companies, which are doing business with Huawei, need licenses on the specific terms applied by the US government. The US trying to lobby against Huawei with other democratic industrial democracies like the UK, Germany, and other European countries that not use Huawei’s 5G equipment. On the other hand, China’s company Huawei is making its own 5G network and dealing to sell it to other mobile companies and the European countries are not seems to stand along with the US in this scenario. Past studies have predicted future trade relations. There are several possible reasons behind the ban of Huawei, escalation of a trade war between China and the US, new taxes on Chinese products by the US government, Made in China 2025, Huawei is a national security threat for the US due to lack of data privacy, China’s profitable business of 5G and rise of nationalistic American behavior over the free trade concept. The purpose of this research is to explore the digital media discourse of the US, UK, and China to identify the reason behind the blockade of Huawei by the US government. News articles selected about the ban of Huawei from the US, UK, and Chinese’s digital news webs. With the help of discourse analysis, this research will analyze the concerning phenomenon. The expected results are that Huawei is a national security threat for the U.S.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国政府对华为封锁的数字媒体话语
在这个全球化的世界中,强国更加注重经济能力,以维持其在国际舞台上的影响力和权力。当今世界,世界上两个经济大国在贸易战领域相互对峙。美国是世界头号经济体,另一方面,中国应该会超过它。美国对中国的核心不满是意识形态和政治分歧;中国的新兴经济是对美国霸权的潜在威胁。近日,特朗普政府将华为及其70家关联公司列入美国“实体名单”,指控华为公司对美国国家安全构成威胁。实体清单是指与华为有业务往来的美国公司,需要按照美国政府规定的具体条款获得许可。美国试图游说其他民主工业民主国家,如英国、德国和其他不使用华为5G设备的欧洲国家,反对华为。另一方面,中国公司华为正在制造自己的5G网络,并打算将其出售给其他移动公司,在这种情况下,欧洲国家似乎与美国站在一起。过去的研究预测了未来的贸易关系。禁令背后有几个可能的原因,中美贸易战升级,美国政府对中国产品征收新税,中国制造2025,华为因缺乏数据隐私而对美国构成国家安全威胁,中国有利可图的5G业务以及美国民族主义行为对自由贸易概念的兴起。本研究的目的是探讨美国、英国和中国的数字媒体话语,以找出美国政府封锁华为背后的原因。有关美国、英国和中国数字新闻网站禁止华为的新闻文章。本研究将借助语篇分析对相关现象进行分析。预期的结果是,华为对美国的国家安全构成威胁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Globalization and Female Economic Participation in MINT and BRICS countries Digital Media Discourse on the Blockage of Huawei by the US Government 2019 World Pensions Forum Held in EU Capital Before G7 Summit Impact of additional equity capital on bank funding costs: Australian evidence Monetary Policy and Financial System Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1