PACs and January 6th: Campaign finance and objections to the Electoral College vote count

Kenneth M Miller, Tanner Bates
{"title":"PACs and January 6th: Campaign finance and objections to the Electoral College vote count","authors":"Kenneth M Miller, Tanner Bates","doi":"10.1177/20531680231188267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are members of Congress who receive more of their campaign funding from organized interests more supportive of democratic norms compared to members who receive more of their contributions from individual donors? We analyze the campaign receipts of Republican House members in the 2020 campaign cycle and votes to object to electors for Joe Biden from Arizona and Pennsylvania and find that greater contributions to members’ campaigns from business PACs are associated with a lower probability that members voted to object to electors. Further, members’ own margin of victory in 2020 has no association with these votes when controlling for other factors, but members from districts where Trump performed better are more likely to have objected to counting Electoral College votes for his opponent. Our results demonstrate a positive association between campaign contributions from corporate PACs and support for democratic institutions within the Republican caucus in the U.S. House.","PeriodicalId":125693,"journal":{"name":"Research & Politics","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231188267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Are members of Congress who receive more of their campaign funding from organized interests more supportive of democratic norms compared to members who receive more of their contributions from individual donors? We analyze the campaign receipts of Republican House members in the 2020 campaign cycle and votes to object to electors for Joe Biden from Arizona and Pennsylvania and find that greater contributions to members’ campaigns from business PACs are associated with a lower probability that members voted to object to electors. Further, members’ own margin of victory in 2020 has no association with these votes when controlling for other factors, but members from districts where Trump performed better are more likely to have objected to counting Electoral College votes for his opponent. Our results demonstrate a positive association between campaign contributions from corporate PACs and support for democratic institutions within the Republican caucus in the U.S. House.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治行动委员会和1月6日:竞选资金和对选举团计票的反对
与从个人捐赠者那里获得更多捐款的国会议员相比,从有组织利益集团那里获得更多竞选资金的国会议员是否更支持民主规范?我们分析了共和党众议院议员在2020年竞选周期中的竞选收入,以及反对乔·拜登(Joe Biden)来自亚利桑那州和宾夕法尼亚州的选举人的投票,发现商业政治行动委员会对议员竞选的贡献越大,议员投票反对选举人的可能性就越低。此外,在控制其他因素的情况下,议员们自己在2020年的胜差与这些选票没有关联,但来自特朗普表现更好的选区的议员更有可能反对将选举人团的选票计算给他的对手。我们的研究结果表明,企业政治行动委员会的竞选捐款与美国众议院共和党核心小组对民主制度的支持之间存在正相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PhD stipends and program placement success in political science Does affective empathy capacity condition individual variation in support for military escalation? Evidence from a survey vignette It’s the robots, stupid? Automation risk, labour market resources and incumbent support in Europe Using MI-LASSO to study populist radical right voting in times of pandemic Political trust and public support for propaganda in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1