Criteria for Comparing Requirements Variability Modeling Notations for Product Lines

Olfa Djebbi, C. Salinesi
{"title":"Criteria for Comparing Requirements Variability Modeling Notations for Product Lines","authors":"Olfa Djebbi, C. Salinesi","doi":"10.1109/CERE.2006.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software product families have proven to be an effective approach to reuse in software development. For planning requirements reuse, several variability approaches are developed. This study is made in an industrial company producing blood analysis automatons. It aims at finding the most suitable notation to model requirements variability for the product line developed by the company. The paper provides a comparative survey on feature-based notations for requirements variability modeling. It introduces an evaluation framework based on criteria that are derived by studying the main engineers' expectations for such a notation. The evaluation is fulfilled by making out notations' metamodels. The use of these languages is systematically illustrated with the same example, adapted from the company context, in order to refine the notation selection approach. Finally, recommendations are done, and issues on making the approach systematic are discussed.","PeriodicalId":148770,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'06 - RE'06 Workshop)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'06 - RE'06 Workshop)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERE.2006.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Software product families have proven to be an effective approach to reuse in software development. For planning requirements reuse, several variability approaches are developed. This study is made in an industrial company producing blood analysis automatons. It aims at finding the most suitable notation to model requirements variability for the product line developed by the company. The paper provides a comparative survey on feature-based notations for requirements variability modeling. It introduces an evaluation framework based on criteria that are derived by studying the main engineers' expectations for such a notation. The evaluation is fulfilled by making out notations' metamodels. The use of these languages is systematically illustrated with the same example, adapted from the company context, in order to refine the notation selection approach. Finally, recommendations are done, and issues on making the approach systematic are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较产品线的需求可变性建模符号的标准
软件产品族已经被证明是一种在软件开发中实现重用的有效方法。为了规划需求重用,开发了几种可变性方法。这项研究是在一家生产血液分析机器的工业公司进行的。它的目的是找到最合适的符号来为公司开发的产品线建模需求可变性。本文对需求可变性建模的基于特征的符号进行了比较研究。它引入了一个基于标准的评估框架,这些标准是通过研究主要工程师对这种符号的期望而得出的。通过构造符号的元模型来完成评价。为了改进表示法的选择方法,本文用相同的例子系统地说明了这些语言的使用,这些例子改编自公司的上下文。最后,提出了建议,并讨论了使该方法系统化的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Criteria for Comparing Requirements Variability Modeling Notations for Product Lines Comparative semantics of Feature Diagrams: FFD vs. vDFD On a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Social-Agent Scenario Visualization Using a Hybrid Method for Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Requirements Inputs Using Expertise as a Framework for Evaluating Requirements Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1