National standards for New Zealand’s primary and intermediate school pupils

M. Thrupp
{"title":"National standards for New Zealand’s primary and intermediate school pupils","authors":"M. Thrupp","doi":"10.26686/NZAROE.V0I17.1531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A key education policy plank for the National Party going into the 2008 election is to be National Standards for primary and intermediate pupils in reading, writing and numeracy. These are seen to be more acceptable than the national testing which occurs in England, the United States and other countries. But are they really more acceptable? This article will review evidence about the perverse effects of national testing, consider what is known about the National Standards proposed for New Zealand, and assess whether they are likely to avoid many of the same damaging effects on schools and pupils. It is argued that although the National Party is trying to distinguish its policies from national testing, the distinctions are not yet significant enough to prevent the problems which have been experienced overseas.","PeriodicalId":377372,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand Annual Review of Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand Annual Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/NZAROE.V0I17.1531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

A key education policy plank for the National Party going into the 2008 election is to be National Standards for primary and intermediate pupils in reading, writing and numeracy. These are seen to be more acceptable than the national testing which occurs in England, the United States and other countries. But are they really more acceptable? This article will review evidence about the perverse effects of national testing, consider what is known about the National Standards proposed for New Zealand, and assess whether they are likely to avoid many of the same damaging effects on schools and pupils. It is argued that although the National Party is trying to distinguish its policies from national testing, the distinctions are not yet significant enough to prevent the problems which have been experienced overseas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰小学生和中学生的国家标准
国家党在2008年大选中提出的一项重要教育政策纲领是为中小学生制定阅读、写作和计算方面的国家标准。这些被认为比在英国、美国和其他国家进行的全国测试更容易接受。但他们真的更容易被接受吗?本文将回顾有关国家考试的不良影响的证据,考虑到对新西兰提出的国家标准的了解,并评估它们是否有可能避免对学校和学生造成许多相同的破坏性影响。有人认为,虽然国家党试图将其政策与国家测试区分开来,但这种区分还不足以防止在国外经历的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What will it take? Knowledgeable and qualified early childhood teachers: Tensions, constraints, and possibilities Transformative shifts in early childhood education systems after four decades of neoliberalism Leading education into the future What we can do to realise our excellence and equity goals in literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1