Gotta Catch ’em All: A Multistage Framework for Honeypot Fingerprinting

Shreyas Srinivasa, J. Pedersen, Emmanouil Vasilomanolakis
{"title":"Gotta Catch ’em All: A Multistage Framework for Honeypot Fingerprinting","authors":"Shreyas Srinivasa, J. Pedersen, Emmanouil Vasilomanolakis","doi":"10.1145/3584976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Honeypots are decoy systems that lure attackers by presenting them with a seemingly vulnerable system. They provide an early detection mechanism as well as a method for learning how adversaries work and think. However, over the past years, several researchers have shown methods for fingerprinting honeypots. This significantly decreases the value of a honeypot; if an attacker is able to recognize the existence of such a system, they can evade it. In this article, we revisit the honeypot identification field, by providing a holistic framework that includes state-of-the-art and novel fingerprinting components. We decrease the probability of false positives by proposing a rigid multi-step approach for labeling a system as a honeypot. We perform extensive scans covering 2.9 billion addresses of the IPv4 space and identify a total of 21,855 honeypot instances. Moreover, we present several interesting side findings such as the identification of around 355,000 non-honeypot systems that represent potentially misconfigured or unpatched vulnerable servers (e.g., SSH servers with default password configurations and vulnerable versions). We ethically disclose our findings to network administrators about the default configuration and the honeypot developers about the gaps in implementation that lead to possible honeypot fingerprinting. Last, we discuss countermeasures against honeypot fingerprinting techniques.","PeriodicalId":202552,"journal":{"name":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Threats: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3584976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Honeypots are decoy systems that lure attackers by presenting them with a seemingly vulnerable system. They provide an early detection mechanism as well as a method for learning how adversaries work and think. However, over the past years, several researchers have shown methods for fingerprinting honeypots. This significantly decreases the value of a honeypot; if an attacker is able to recognize the existence of such a system, they can evade it. In this article, we revisit the honeypot identification field, by providing a holistic framework that includes state-of-the-art and novel fingerprinting components. We decrease the probability of false positives by proposing a rigid multi-step approach for labeling a system as a honeypot. We perform extensive scans covering 2.9 billion addresses of the IPv4 space and identify a total of 21,855 honeypot instances. Moreover, we present several interesting side findings such as the identification of around 355,000 non-honeypot systems that represent potentially misconfigured or unpatched vulnerable servers (e.g., SSH servers with default password configurations and vulnerable versions). We ethically disclose our findings to network administrators about the default configuration and the honeypot developers about the gaps in implementation that lead to possible honeypot fingerprinting. Last, we discuss countermeasures against honeypot fingerprinting techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要抓住他们全部:蜜罐指纹的多级框架
蜜罐是一种诱饵系统,通过向攻击者展示一个看似脆弱的系统来引诱攻击者。它们提供了一种早期检测机制,以及一种了解对手如何工作和思考的方法。然而,在过去的几年里,一些研究人员已经展示了指纹蜜罐的方法。这大大降低了蜜罐的价值;如果攻击者能够识别出这样一个系统的存在,他们就可以逃避它。在本文中,我们通过提供一个包括最先进和新颖指纹组件的整体框架,重新审视蜜罐识别领域。我们通过提出一种严格的多步骤方法来将系统标记为蜜罐,从而降低误报的概率。我们对IPv4空间的29亿个地址进行了广泛的扫描,并确定了总共21,855个蜜罐实例。此外,我们还提出了一些有趣的发现,例如识别了大约355,000个非蜜罐系统,这些系统代表了可能配置错误或未打补丁的易受攻击的服务器(例如,具有默认密码配置和易受攻击版本的SSH服务器)。我们有道德地向网络管理员披露我们关于默认配置的发现,并向蜜罐开发人员披露可能导致蜜罐指纹的实现差距。最后,讨论了蜜罐指纹识别技术的防范措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Causal Inconsistencies are Normal in Windows Memory Dumps (too) InvesTEE: A TEE-supported Framework for Lawful Remote Forensic Investigations Does Cyber Insurance promote Cyber Security Best Practice? An Analysis based on Insurance Application Forms Unveiling Cyber Threat Actors: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Behavior-based Attribution A Framework for Enhancing Social Media Misinformation Detection with Topical-Tactics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1