Radiopathological Correlation in Diagnosis of Adnexal Lesions: A Hospital Based Comparative Study

N. Paudel, Prasanna Ghimire, A. Jha, Pooja Baidya, P. Ghimire, Hom Nath Adhikari
{"title":"Radiopathological Correlation in Diagnosis of Adnexal Lesions: A Hospital Based Comparative Study","authors":"N. Paudel, Prasanna Ghimire, A. Jha, Pooja Baidya, P. Ghimire, Hom Nath Adhikari","doi":"10.3126/jngmc.v20i2.51834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound can be used in distinguishing lesions of adnexa. Transvaginal ultrasound has higher diagnostic accuracy than transabdominal ultrasound when compared with gold standard histopathology. It also provides better resolution as compared to transabdominal ultrasound. \nAims: To find the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of transvaginal and transabdominal sonographic techniques in adnexal pathologies by comparing against the gold standard of biopsy. \nMethods: Hospital based cross sectional comparative study done in 108 cases who underwent transabdominal and transvaginal sonography and histopathological study post operatively. Diagnostic findings of transabdominal and transvaginal sonogram were compared with the diagnosis of histopathology. \nResults: Of total 108 cases, most cases were benign. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for transabdominal were 63.15 %, 95.5%, 89.8%, 75% and 92.3% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of transvaginal were 73.6%, 95.5%, 91.6%, 77.7% and 94.4% respectively. \nConclusion: Transvaginal sonography has higher diagnostic accuracy as compared to transabdominal ultrasonography.","PeriodicalId":166882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i2.51834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound can be used in distinguishing lesions of adnexa. Transvaginal ultrasound has higher diagnostic accuracy than transabdominal ultrasound when compared with gold standard histopathology. It also provides better resolution as compared to transabdominal ultrasound. Aims: To find the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of transvaginal and transabdominal sonographic techniques in adnexal pathologies by comparing against the gold standard of biopsy. Methods: Hospital based cross sectional comparative study done in 108 cases who underwent transabdominal and transvaginal sonography and histopathological study post operatively. Diagnostic findings of transabdominal and transvaginal sonogram were compared with the diagnosis of histopathology. Results: Of total 108 cases, most cases were benign. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for transabdominal were 63.15 %, 95.5%, 89.8%, 75% and 92.3% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of transvaginal were 73.6%, 95.5%, 91.6%, 77.7% and 94.4% respectively. Conclusion: Transvaginal sonography has higher diagnostic accuracy as compared to transabdominal ultrasonography.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
附件病变诊断的放射病理学相关性:基于医院的比较研究
简介:经腹、经阴道超声可用于附件病变的鉴别。经阴道超声与金标准组织病理学比较,诊断准确性高于经腹部超声。与经腹超声相比,它也提供了更好的分辨率。目的:通过与活检金标准的比较,探讨经阴道和经腹部超声技术诊断附件病变的准确性和有效性。方法:对108例经腹、经阴道超声及术后组织病理学检查的患者进行横断面比较研究。将经腹、经阴道超声诊断结果与组织病理学诊断结果进行比较。结果:108例病例中,多数为良性。经腹诊断的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为63.15%、95.5%、89.8%、75%和92.3%。经阴道检查的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为73.6%、95.5%、91.6%、77.7%和94.4%。结论:经阴道超声与经腹部超声相比具有更高的诊断准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Relationship of Lipid Profile, BMI and Blood Pressure among Non-diabetic Hypertensive Patients - A Hospital Based Study Comparative Study of Opioid Free versus Opioid Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Radiopathological Correlation in Diagnosis of Adnexal Lesions: A Hospital Based Comparative Study Correlation of Mastoid Pneumatization with Middle Ear Pathology in Unilateral Squamous Type of Chronic Otitis Media Functional Outcome of Isolated Middle to Distal Third Ulnar Shaft Fracture in Adults with Square Nail Fixation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1