Research Hotspots and Trend Analysis of User Experience Design for Healthcare Service System

Xinyue Zhang
{"title":"Research Hotspots and Trend Analysis of User Experience Design for Healthcare Service System","authors":"Xinyue Zhang","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International Organization for Standardization(ISO) defines user experience as the perceptions and responses of users about the usage or anticipated use of a system, product, or service. The notion of \"patient-centred\" service has steadily evolved over the last several years, focusing on user experience in the healthcare service system. Current research on user experience in healthcare service systems integrates topics such as psychology, design, and engineering. It is impossible to conduct an impartial analysis of this multidisciplinary topic based on a survey of the traditional literature due to the complexity and volume of the reference material. This study utilises bibliometrics to visualise the retrieved data's knowledge structure and structure of the retrieved data and to offer a foundation for future research in the area of user experience design for healthcare service systems.The information for this research comes from the Web of Science. The search strategy was TS=((User Experience)AND(Medical Services OR Medical Products OR Medical Diagnostic Equipment)), and the search sources were the five primary citation indexes typically utilised in the WOS database: SSCI, SCI-Expanded, A&HCI, CPCI-S and CPCI-SSH. During the search process, the sources had to be modified or eliminated to prevent the loss of interdisciplinary literature. The search results were produced as \"complete records and cited references\" text files. Manual screening is used to screen out publications that diverge from the subject of the study, lack on-site information (e.g., time, keywords, authors, and other crucial information), include duplicate data, or are otherwise distracting. For additional quantitative analysis, a total of 2030 articles were retrieved.This work employs a mix of bibliometrics, content analysis, and information visualisation, as proposed by Pritchard in 1969: bibliometrics may assist in identifying patterns and information in vast volumes of literature via quantitative analysis of all sorts of literature. The study also used a combination of two bibliometric tools, CiteSpace and VOSviewer, to examine keyword co-occurrence analysis and literature co-citation in the cited literature and to map the associated scientific information to visualise research paths and frontier regions.The results of the study indicate that: 1. From a macro perspective, the number of documents in the search area is increasing and will remain a key research direction in the academic community; 2. From the perspective of the number of articles published, the UK, the US, China, and Canada are leading the research in this field; kings coll London, Mcmaster univ, Boston univ and other institutions are more active, but there are few high-producing institutions, and eastern Europe is the least productive region. The need for more collaboration between research institutions and between institutions and writers and the shortage of prolific authors represent the most significant research limitations. 3.The disciplines of \"healthcare,\" \"experience,\" \"mental health,\" \"services,\" \"telemedicine,\" \"patient satisfaction,\" \"impact,\" and \"schizophrenia\" are varied and strongly interrelated. Nonetheless, this topic's fundamental study has generated many great works.","PeriodicalId":409565,"journal":{"name":"Usability and User Experience","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Usability and User Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International Organization for Standardization(ISO) defines user experience as the perceptions and responses of users about the usage or anticipated use of a system, product, or service. The notion of "patient-centred" service has steadily evolved over the last several years, focusing on user experience in the healthcare service system. Current research on user experience in healthcare service systems integrates topics such as psychology, design, and engineering. It is impossible to conduct an impartial analysis of this multidisciplinary topic based on a survey of the traditional literature due to the complexity and volume of the reference material. This study utilises bibliometrics to visualise the retrieved data's knowledge structure and structure of the retrieved data and to offer a foundation for future research in the area of user experience design for healthcare service systems.The information for this research comes from the Web of Science. The search strategy was TS=((User Experience)AND(Medical Services OR Medical Products OR Medical Diagnostic Equipment)), and the search sources were the five primary citation indexes typically utilised in the WOS database: SSCI, SCI-Expanded, A&HCI, CPCI-S and CPCI-SSH. During the search process, the sources had to be modified or eliminated to prevent the loss of interdisciplinary literature. The search results were produced as "complete records and cited references" text files. Manual screening is used to screen out publications that diverge from the subject of the study, lack on-site information (e.g., time, keywords, authors, and other crucial information), include duplicate data, or are otherwise distracting. For additional quantitative analysis, a total of 2030 articles were retrieved.This work employs a mix of bibliometrics, content analysis, and information visualisation, as proposed by Pritchard in 1969: bibliometrics may assist in identifying patterns and information in vast volumes of literature via quantitative analysis of all sorts of literature. The study also used a combination of two bibliometric tools, CiteSpace and VOSviewer, to examine keyword co-occurrence analysis and literature co-citation in the cited literature and to map the associated scientific information to visualise research paths and frontier regions.The results of the study indicate that: 1. From a macro perspective, the number of documents in the search area is increasing and will remain a key research direction in the academic community; 2. From the perspective of the number of articles published, the UK, the US, China, and Canada are leading the research in this field; kings coll London, Mcmaster univ, Boston univ and other institutions are more active, but there are few high-producing institutions, and eastern Europe is the least productive region. The need for more collaboration between research institutions and between institutions and writers and the shortage of prolific authors represent the most significant research limitations. 3.The disciplines of "healthcare," "experience," "mental health," "services," "telemedicine," "patient satisfaction," "impact," and "schizophrenia" are varied and strongly interrelated. Nonetheless, this topic's fundamental study has generated many great works.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗服务系统用户体验设计研究热点与趋势分析
国际标准化组织(ISO)将用户体验定义为用户对系统、产品或服务的使用或预期使用的感知和反应。“以患者为中心”的服务理念在过去几年中稳步发展,重点关注医疗服务系统中的用户体验。目前对医疗保健服务系统用户体验的研究整合了心理学、设计和工程学等主题。由于参考资料的复杂性和数量,不可能在对传统文献进行调查的基础上对这一多学科主题进行公正的分析。本研究利用文献计量学来可视化检索数据的知识结构和检索数据的结构,并为医疗服务系统用户体验设计领域的未来研究提供基础。这项研究的信息来自科学网。检索策略为TS=(用户体验)AND(医疗服务或医疗产品或医疗诊断设备),检索来源为WOS数据库中常用的5种主要引文索引:SSCI、SCI-Expanded、A&HCI、CPCI-S和CPCI-SSH。在检索过程中,必须修改或删除来源,以防止跨学科文献的丢失。搜索结果以“完整记录和引用文献”文本文件的形式产生。人工筛选用于筛选与研究主题偏离,缺乏现场信息(例如,时间,关键词,作者和其他关键信息),包含重复数据或其他分散注意力的出版物。为了进一步的定量分析,共检索了2030篇文章。这项工作采用了文献计量学、内容分析和信息可视化的混合方法,正如普里查德在1969年提出的那样:文献计量学可以通过对各种文献的定量分析,帮助识别大量文献中的模式和信息。本研究还结合了CiteSpace和VOSviewer两种文献计量工具,对被引文献中的关键词共现分析和文献共被引进行了分析,并绘制了相关的科学信息图,以可视化研究路径和前沿区域。研究结果表明:1。从宏观上看,检索领域的文献数量不断增加,仍将是学术界的重点研究方向;2. 从发表的论文数量来看,英国、美国、中国和加拿大在该领域的研究处于领先地位;伦敦大学国王学院、麦克马斯特大学、波士顿大学等院校较为活跃,但高产院校寥寥无几,东欧是最不高产的地区。研究机构之间以及机构与作者之间需要更多的合作,而多产作者的短缺是研究的最大限制。3.“保健”、“经验”、“心理健康”、“服务”、“远程医疗”、“患者满意度”、“影响”和“精神分裂症”等学科各不相同,且密切相关。尽管如此,这一主题的基础研究产生了许多伟大的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Colormap-Based Effectiveness of Basic Visualizations Eliciting potential for positive UX using psychological needs: Towards a user-centered method to identify technologies for UX in the car interior Heuristic Evaluation of Public Service Chatbots Deep Analysis of the Web Accessibility and Usability of Videoconferencing Platforms for Blind People Controlled experimentation to improve the usability of business management systems: UDA-ERP case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1