Optimal Degree of Funding of Public Sector Pension Plans

A. C. Meíjdam, Eduard H. M. Ponds, L. Meijdam
{"title":"Optimal Degree of Funding of Public Sector Pension Plans","authors":"A. C. Meíjdam, Eduard H. M. Ponds, L. Meijdam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2216584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the optimal degree of funding of public sector pension plans. It is assumed that a benevolent social planner decides on the contribution of current taxpayers to the funding of public sector pensions next period, weighing the interests of current and future tax payers. Two elements play a role in the optimal funding decision: the optimal-portfolio choice (i.e. the tradeoff between the expected excess return and the additional risk of funding vis-a-vis pay-as-you-go) and intergenerational redistribution (i.e. whether the current generation of tax payers is willing and capable to prefund the pension obligations of current public sector workers or shifts the burden to future generations via a pay-as-you-go scheme). The optimal degree of funding appears to vary over time, depending not only on the relative weight given to the current generation, risk aversion, and the distribution of financial risk and human capital risk, but also on the actual state of the economy, i.e. on wage income, funding in the past and the realization of the excess return on this funding.","PeriodicalId":400499,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Employment-Based Pensions (Topic)","volume":" 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Employment-Based Pensions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2216584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explores the optimal degree of funding of public sector pension plans. It is assumed that a benevolent social planner decides on the contribution of current taxpayers to the funding of public sector pensions next period, weighing the interests of current and future tax payers. Two elements play a role in the optimal funding decision: the optimal-portfolio choice (i.e. the tradeoff between the expected excess return and the additional risk of funding vis-a-vis pay-as-you-go) and intergenerational redistribution (i.e. whether the current generation of tax payers is willing and capable to prefund the pension obligations of current public sector workers or shifts the burden to future generations via a pay-as-you-go scheme). The optimal degree of funding appears to vary over time, depending not only on the relative weight given to the current generation, risk aversion, and the distribution of financial risk and human capital risk, but also on the actual state of the economy, i.e. on wage income, funding in the past and the realization of the excess return on this funding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共部门养老金计划的最优筹资程度
本文探讨了公共部门养老金计划的最优筹资程度。假设一位仁慈的社会规划者权衡当前和未来纳税人的利益,决定当前纳税人在下一时期为公共部门养老金提供资金的贡献。两个因素在最优融资决策中发挥作用:最优投资组合选择(即预期超额回报与现收现付的额外融资风险之间的权衡)和代际再分配(即当前这一代纳税人是否愿意并有能力预先为当前公共部门工作人员的养老金义务提供资金,或通过现收现付计划将负担转移给后代)。最优的资金投入程度似乎随着时间的推移而变化,这不仅取决于对当代人、风险厌恶程度、金融风险和人力资本风险分布的相对权重,还取决于经济的实际状况,即工资收入、过去的资金投入以及这种资金的超额回报的实现情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Design and Welfare Implications of Mandatory Pension Plans State-Sponsored Pensions for Private Sector Workers: The Case for Pooled Annuities and Tontines What if OregonSaves Went National: A Look at the Impact on Retirement Income Adequacy The Quest for Sustainability in Contingent Pension Plans Poverty Reduction Among Older People Through Pensions: A Comparative Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1