Post-Brexit Recognition and Enforcement of Judgements: Problems and Solutions

Matthew Bruce
{"title":"Post-Brexit Recognition and Enforcement of Judgements: Problems and Solutions","authors":"Matthew Bruce","doi":"10.15664/stalj.v3i1.2649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a need for the UK and EU to continue mutual assistance in criminal matters. As a Member State, mutual assistance in criminal matters between the UK and EU was primarily governed by an EU convention. This convention builds on existing Council of Europe conventions on mutual criminal assistance. With the UK now outside the EU’s data protection architecture, this may pose a significant hurdle for future cooperation. This article critically analyses the need for a data adequacy decision from the EU for the UK to engage in mutual assistance in criminal matters post-Brexit. To reach a conclusion, the article is set out over three substantive areas considering: mutual assistance and data protection law as it applies to EU Member States; the law underpinning adequacy decisions; and future legal developments post-Brexit. Specific examples of data transfers and the effect of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement are compared and contrasted to adequacy decisions. While provisions of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement and EU Law Enforcement Directive provide some assurances, the article recommends that a data adequacy decision made under the Directive is pursued.","PeriodicalId":292385,"journal":{"name":"St Andrews Law Journal","volume":"262 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St Andrews Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15664/stalj.v3i1.2649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a need for the UK and EU to continue mutual assistance in criminal matters. As a Member State, mutual assistance in criminal matters between the UK and EU was primarily governed by an EU convention. This convention builds on existing Council of Europe conventions on mutual criminal assistance. With the UK now outside the EU’s data protection architecture, this may pose a significant hurdle for future cooperation. This article critically analyses the need for a data adequacy decision from the EU for the UK to engage in mutual assistance in criminal matters post-Brexit. To reach a conclusion, the article is set out over three substantive areas considering: mutual assistance and data protection law as it applies to EU Member States; the law underpinning adequacy decisions; and future legal developments post-Brexit. Specific examples of data transfers and the effect of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement are compared and contrasted to adequacy decisions. While provisions of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement and EU Law Enforcement Directive provide some assurances, the article recommends that a data adequacy decision made under the Directive is pursued.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国脱欧后判决的承认与执行:问题与解决方案
英国和欧盟有必要在刑事事务上继续相互协助。作为一个成员国,英国与欧盟之间的刑事事务互助主要受欧盟公约的管辖。该公约以欧洲委员会现有的刑事互助公约为基础。由于英国现在不在欧盟的数据保护体系中,这可能会对未来的合作构成重大障碍。本文批判性地分析了欧盟对英国在脱欧后刑事事务中相互协助的数据充足性决定的必要性。为了得出结论,本文将考虑三个实质性领域:互助和数据保护法,因为它适用于欧盟成员国;支持充分性决定的法律;以及英国脱欧后的未来法律发展。数据转移的具体例子和贸易与合作协定的效果与充分性决定进行了比较和对比。虽然《贸易与合作协定》和《欧盟执法指令》的规定提供了一些保证,但本文建议遵循根据《指令》做出的数据充分性决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Rape Law Revisions should be Consistent with Anderson’s Negotiation Model Post-Brexit Recognition and Enforcement of Judgements: Problems and Solutions The Post-Brexit Need for a Data Adequacy Decision to Engage in Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters with the EU State Prevention Targeting Persons Attracted to Minors in Europe AI Systems and Liability: An Assessment of the Applicability of Strict Liability & A Case for Limited Legal Personhood for AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1