The Quality of Citations: Towards Quantifying Qualitative Impact in Social Science Research

P. Bauer, Pablo Barberá, Simon Munzert
{"title":"The Quality of Citations: Towards Quantifying Qualitative Impact in Social Science Research","authors":"P. Bauer, Pablo Barberá, Simon Munzert","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2874549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quantity of citations (“times cited”) has evolved into an influential indicator of scientific impact both in itself and packaged into other metrics (e.g. h-index, impact factor). In this study we contrast the idea of “quantity” with the idea of the “quality” of citations, i.e. the “quality” of impact. We develop and present methods that can be used to move from a superficial assessment of citation quantity to a more nuanced view of the quality of citations. We illustrate these methods using six highly cited study in the fields of political science, economics and sociology. In the future this more nuanced view and the data we are generating should allow for testing various hypotheses linked to the reception of scientific works and the sociology of science more generally. Our study is complemented by opensource code (based on R) that shall be collected in a R package CitationsR that allows other researchers to pursue their own analyses of the quality of impact of one or several studies.","PeriodicalId":117077,"journal":{"name":"Political Methods: Computational eJournal","volume":"125 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Methods: Computational eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2874549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quantity of citations (“times cited”) has evolved into an influential indicator of scientific impact both in itself and packaged into other metrics (e.g. h-index, impact factor). In this study we contrast the idea of “quantity” with the idea of the “quality” of citations, i.e. the “quality” of impact. We develop and present methods that can be used to move from a superficial assessment of citation quantity to a more nuanced view of the quality of citations. We illustrate these methods using six highly cited study in the fields of political science, economics and sociology. In the future this more nuanced view and the data we are generating should allow for testing various hypotheses linked to the reception of scientific works and the sociology of science more generally. Our study is complemented by opensource code (based on R) that shall be collected in a R package CitationsR that allows other researchers to pursue their own analyses of the quality of impact of one or several studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引文质量:走向量化社会科学研究的定性影响
被引次数(“被引次数”)已发展成为科学影响的一个有影响力的指标,它本身和被打包成其他指标(如h指数、影响因子)。在这项研究中,我们将“数量”的概念与“质量”的概念进行了对比,即影响的“质量”。我们开发并提出了一些方法,可以用来从对引用数量的肤浅评估转向对引用质量的更细致入微的看法。我们用六个在政治学、经济学和社会学领域被高度引用的研究来说明这些方法。在未来,这种更细致的观点和我们正在生成的数据应该允许测试与科学作品的接受和更普遍的科学社会学有关的各种假设。我们的研究由开放源代码(基于R)补充,这些代码将收集在R包CitationsR中,允许其他研究人员对一项或几项研究的影响质量进行自己的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Resource Allocation for Political Campaigns What's the Talk in Brussels? Leveraging Daily News Coverage to Measure Issue Attention in the European Union Fake News in Social Networks Text-as-Data Analysis of Preferential Trade Agreements: Mapping the PTA Landscape Selected Research Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1