Modeling quality, satisfaction and perceived crowding in public healthcare: a study with low-income Brazilian patients

João Guilherme Marcato, Hermes Moretti Ribeiro da Silva, Octaviano Rojas Luiz, E. Mariano, Carly Paro
{"title":"Modeling quality, satisfaction and perceived crowding in public healthcare: a study with low-income Brazilian patients","authors":"João Guilherme Marcato, Hermes Moretti Ribeiro da Silva, Octaviano Rojas Luiz, E. Mariano, Carly Paro","doi":"10.1590/1806-9649-2022v30e10722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is one of the first to propose a research model to assess the quality and satisfaction perceived by low-income Brazilian patients using public healthcare services, under the moderating effect of perceived crowding. The model was evaluated from data obtained from 417 patients, and its proposed relationships and statistics were tested through Structural Equation Modeling using a Partial Least Squares approach (PLS-SEM). To explore the moderating effect of perceived crowding, the sample was divided into two groups and tested by employing multi-group analysis (MGA). The results show that Reliability, Safety, Tangibles, Empathy and Responsiveness have a positive effect on Perceived Healthcare Quality (PHQ), which, in turn, has a marked effect on patient satisfaction (PS), ergo, PHQ acts as antecedent of PS. However, perceived crowding has no moderating effect on any relationship in the model.","PeriodicalId":146264,"journal":{"name":"Gestão & Produção","volume":"37 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestão & Produção","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022v30e10722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper is one of the first to propose a research model to assess the quality and satisfaction perceived by low-income Brazilian patients using public healthcare services, under the moderating effect of perceived crowding. The model was evaluated from data obtained from 417 patients, and its proposed relationships and statistics were tested through Structural Equation Modeling using a Partial Least Squares approach (PLS-SEM). To explore the moderating effect of perceived crowding, the sample was divided into two groups and tested by employing multi-group analysis (MGA). The results show that Reliability, Safety, Tangibles, Empathy and Responsiveness have a positive effect on Perceived Healthcare Quality (PHQ), which, in turn, has a marked effect on patient satisfaction (PS), ergo, PHQ acts as antecedent of PS. However, perceived crowding has no moderating effect on any relationship in the model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共医疗保健的建模质量、满意度和感知拥挤:一项针对巴西低收入患者的研究
摘要本文首次提出了一个研究模型来评估巴西低收入患者在感知拥挤的调节作用下使用公共医疗服务的质量和满意度。从417例患者中获得的数据对模型进行评估,并通过使用偏最小二乘法(PLS-SEM)的结构方程建模对其提出的关系和统计量进行检验。为了探讨感知拥挤的调节作用,将样本分为两组,采用多组分析(MGA)进行检验。结果表明,可靠性、安全性、有形资产、共情和反应性对感知医疗质量(PHQ)有正向影响,而感知医疗质量对患者满意度(PS)有显著影响,因此,感知医疗质量是感知医疗质量的前项,而感知拥挤对模型中的任何关系都没有调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge management and Industry 4.0: a critical analysis and future agenda Construction site design planning using 4D BIM modeling Transformations in female representations in beer advertisements: a Strategic Actions Fields perspective The role of green supply chain management and green innovation in the effect of corporate social responsibility on firm performance Social construction as a means of ergonomic intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1