Automatic Refactoring Method to Remove Eager Test Smell

Adriano Pizzini, S. Reinehr, A. Malucelli
{"title":"Automatic Refactoring Method to Remove Eager Test Smell","authors":"Adriano Pizzini, S. Reinehr, A. Malucelli","doi":"10.1145/3571473.3571478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unit tests are artifacts generated during the development process to identify software errors early. Unit tests can be affected by Test Smells (TS), which are defined as poorly designed tests due to bad programming practices implemented in unit test code. Problems caused by TS negatively impact the efficiency of developers and the understanding and maintenance of unit tests. Reducing the problems caused by TS can occur through refactoring activities. Despite the existence of studies that seek to identify the occurrence of TS in unit tests and proposals for semi-automatic refactoring, there are no studies related to the automatic removal of TS from the test repository. In this context, this study presents a method for automatic TS removal called Eager Test, which occurs when a test verifies more than one method of the code. The proposed method was evaluated through experiments, comparing the original version of a unit tests repository with its automatically refactored version. The results are promising, showing an Eager Test removal rate of 99,4% of unit tests in the repository without causing test errors or test fails. However, there was an increase in test execution time and of lines of code, resulting from the quantity of tests that were extracted. The proposed method supports improving the quality of unit tests and reduces the effort required by developers to remove Eager Test.","PeriodicalId":440784,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the XXI Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the XXI Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3571473.3571478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unit tests are artifacts generated during the development process to identify software errors early. Unit tests can be affected by Test Smells (TS), which are defined as poorly designed tests due to bad programming practices implemented in unit test code. Problems caused by TS negatively impact the efficiency of developers and the understanding and maintenance of unit tests. Reducing the problems caused by TS can occur through refactoring activities. Despite the existence of studies that seek to identify the occurrence of TS in unit tests and proposals for semi-automatic refactoring, there are no studies related to the automatic removal of TS from the test repository. In this context, this study presents a method for automatic TS removal called Eager Test, which occurs when a test verifies more than one method of the code. The proposed method was evaluated through experiments, comparing the original version of a unit tests repository with its automatically refactored version. The results are promising, showing an Eager Test removal rate of 99,4% of unit tests in the repository without causing test errors or test fails. However, there was an increase in test execution time and of lines of code, resulting from the quantity of tests that were extracted. The proposed method supports improving the quality of unit tests and reduces the effort required by developers to remove Eager Test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除急切测试气味的自动重构方法
单元测试是在开发过程中生成的工件,用于早期识别软件错误。单元测试可能会受到测试气味(Test smell, TS)的影响,TS被定义为由于在单元测试代码中实现的不良编程实践而导致的设计不良的测试。TS引起的问题对开发人员的效率以及对单元测试的理解和维护产生了负面影响。通过重构活动可以减少由TS引起的问题。尽管有一些研究试图确定TS在单元测试中的出现情况,并提出了半自动重构的建议,但没有与从测试存储库中自动删除TS相关的研究。在这种情况下,本研究提出了一种自动删除TS的方法,称为Eager Test,当测试验证代码的多个方法时,就会发生这种情况。通过实验,比较单元测试存储库的原始版本和自动重构版本,对所提出的方法进行了评估。结果是很有希望的,在没有导致测试错误或测试失败的情况下,Eager Test在存储库中删除了99.4%的单元测试。然而,测试执行时间和代码行数都有所增加,这是由于提取的测试数量造成的。所提出的方法支持提高单元测试的质量,并减少开发人员移除Eager Test所需的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Agile Organizations Use Metrics: A Systematic Literature Mapping An Ontology to support Knowledge Management Solutions for Human-Computer Interaction Design Joy to the Work: How Does Software Team Formation Strategy Influence Job Satisfaction? Automatic Refactoring Method to Remove Eager Test Smell Enriching user stories with usability features in a remote agile project: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1