Benchmarking of software production costs: Results & recommendations

L. Pereira, Claudia Teixeira
{"title":"Benchmarking of software production costs: Results & recommendations","authors":"L. Pereira, Claudia Teixeira","doi":"10.1109/ICE.2017.8279863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the software production cost in the banking sector through a benchmarking analysis. Furthermore, the paper provides a set of recommendations to assist organizations become more efficient, productive and more competitive. This analysis was performed based on a representative sample in the Portuguese market based on a sample of 21 projects. These projects represent a total of 37.800 hours and a 2.984.000 budget. The data collection was completed during 2 months, January and February in 2016 through different business research methods namely 15 Interviews to project managers regarding 21 projects and historical data collection. The sample went through a segmentation in two groups due to the dispersion verified among the results between some banks. These two segments were classified as “Classic Retail” — national banks of high dimension, with market recognition and influential in the Portuguese economy — and “Niche Banks”-smaller banks. Briefly, in terms of rates and considering the “Classic Retail” segment, the discrepancy of rates between the two niches is visible, the average rate of Classic Retail is 64.7% above the Niche Banks segment. In regards to productivity, The Classic Retail's average is about 11h per unit of software produced while for the Niche segment it is about 2.6h.","PeriodicalId":421648,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper intends to provide a deeper understanding about the software production cost in the banking sector through a benchmarking analysis. Furthermore, the paper provides a set of recommendations to assist organizations become more efficient, productive and more competitive. This analysis was performed based on a representative sample in the Portuguese market based on a sample of 21 projects. These projects represent a total of 37.800 hours and a 2.984.000 budget. The data collection was completed during 2 months, January and February in 2016 through different business research methods namely 15 Interviews to project managers regarding 21 projects and historical data collection. The sample went through a segmentation in two groups due to the dispersion verified among the results between some banks. These two segments were classified as “Classic Retail” — national banks of high dimension, with market recognition and influential in the Portuguese economy — and “Niche Banks”-smaller banks. Briefly, in terms of rates and considering the “Classic Retail” segment, the discrepancy of rates between the two niches is visible, the average rate of Classic Retail is 64.7% above the Niche Banks segment. In regards to productivity, The Classic Retail's average is about 11h per unit of software produced while for the Niche segment it is about 2.6h.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件生产成本的基准:结果和建议
本文旨在通过对标分析,对银行业软件生产成本有更深入的了解。此外,本文还提供了一组建议,以帮助组织提高效率、生产力和竞争力。这一分析是基于葡萄牙市场的代表性样本,基于21个项目的样本进行的。这些项目总共需要37800小时,预算为2984000小时。数据收集是在2016年1月和2月的2个月内通过不同的商业研究方法完成的,即对21个项目的15个项目经理进行访谈和历史数据收集。由于在一些银行之间的结果之间验证了分散性,样本经历了两组分割。这两类银行被分为"经典零售"和"小众银行",前者是指规模较大、在葡萄牙经济中具有市场认可度和影响力的全国性银行,后者是指规模较小的银行。简而言之,就利率而言,考虑到“经典零售”细分市场,两个利基市场之间的利率差异是显而易见的,经典零售的平均利率比利基银行高64.7%。在生产效率方面,The Classic Retail的平均每单位软件生产时间约为11小时,而Niche细分市场的平均生产时间约为2.6小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban-architect role in smart-city context literature review and case studies UX-FFE model: An experimentation of a new innovation process dedicated to a mature industrial company An examination of barriers to business model innovation Distributed software development of a cloud solution for collaborative manufacturing networks Testing and selecting mixed data type DEA scenarios with PCA post-processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1