Diversity matters: highlighting the differences in sport consumption motives of marginalized college students

Alison Fridley, A. Anderson, S. Stokowski, S. Forsythe
{"title":"Diversity matters: highlighting the differences in sport consumption motives of marginalized college students","authors":"Alison Fridley, A. Anderson, S. Stokowski, S. Forsythe","doi":"10.1108/ijsms-01-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore the differences in motivation for sport consumption within a diverse sample of college students with underrepresented identities.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 2,833 students at universities in a mid-major Division I FBS athletic conference through a survey. Two MANOVAs were conducted to examine group differences. While the first MANOVA compared a dominant group (White and non-LGBTQ+) to an underrepresented group (non-white race and/or LGBTQ+), the second MANOVA explored differences in five specific marginalized groups (Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, LGBTQ+, intersectional marginalized identities).FindingsThe results indicated that the dominant group scored significantly higher than the combined underrepresented group in four of the eight sport consumption motives examined. However, the comparison of individual underrepresented groups showed significant differences for all eight consumption motives between at least two underrepresented groups.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to compare group differences in motivation for sport consumption between specific racially marginalized groups, LGBTQ + community members, and intersectional racial and LGBTQ + identities within college athletics.","PeriodicalId":289192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsms-01-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore the differences in motivation for sport consumption within a diverse sample of college students with underrepresented identities.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 2,833 students at universities in a mid-major Division I FBS athletic conference through a survey. Two MANOVAs were conducted to examine group differences. While the first MANOVA compared a dominant group (White and non-LGBTQ+) to an underrepresented group (non-white race and/or LGBTQ+), the second MANOVA explored differences in five specific marginalized groups (Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, LGBTQ+, intersectional marginalized identities).FindingsThe results indicated that the dominant group scored significantly higher than the combined underrepresented group in four of the eight sport consumption motives examined. However, the comparison of individual underrepresented groups showed significant differences for all eight consumption motives between at least two underrepresented groups.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to compare group differences in motivation for sport consumption between specific racially marginalized groups, LGBTQ + community members, and intersectional racial and LGBTQ + identities within college athletics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多样性至关重要:突出边缘大学生体育消费动机的差异
目的本研究的目的是探讨不同身份未被充分代表的大学生在体育消费动机上的差异。设计/方法/方法采用问卷调查的方式,对参加中级一级FBS运动会的2833名大学生进行调查。进行了两次方差分析以检查组间差异。第一个MANOVA比较了一个优势群体(白人和非LGBTQ+)和一个代表性不足的群体(非白人种族和/或LGBTQ+),第二个MANOVA探讨了五个特定边缘群体(亚洲人、黑人或非裔美国人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔、LGBTQ+、交叉边缘身份)的差异。研究结果表明,在调查的8项体育消费动机中,有4项,优势群体的得分明显高于弱势群体。然而,个体代表性不足的群体的比较显示,至少两个代表性不足的群体在所有八种消费动机上存在显著差异。原创性/价值本研究首次尝试比较特定种族边缘群体、LGBTQ +社区成员以及大学体育运动中种族和LGBTQ +交叉身份之间体育消费动机的群体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let's run green! Impact of runners' environmental consciousness on their green perceived quality and supportive intention at participatory sport events Customer engagement on social media: an examination of NFL teams’ Instagram posts The impacts of social needs and game playing type on esports consumers' positive eWOM sharing: applying the FIRO theory Stakeholders' “voice” through social media: the case of corporate social responsibility in sport Co-branding drivers between professional sport organizations and on-field sports apparel sponsors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1