Interacting User Generated Content Technologies: How Q&As Affect Ratings & Reviews

Shrabastee Banerjee, Chrysanthos Dellarocas, G. Zervas
{"title":"Interacting User Generated Content Technologies: How Q&As Affect Ratings & Reviews","authors":"Shrabastee Banerjee, Chrysanthos Dellarocas, G. Zervas","doi":"10.1145/3033274.3084087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study the question and answer (Q&A) feature of electronic commerce platforms, an increasingly common form of user-generated content (UGC) that allows consumers to publicly ask product-specific questions and receive responses, either from the platform or from other customers. Using data from a major online retailer, we show that Q&As complement reviews and ratings: unlike reviews, Q&As primarily happen pre-purchase, focus on clarification of product attributes (rather than discussion of quality), and convey fit-specific information in a sentiment-free way. Our main hypothesis is that Q&As mitigate product fit uncertainty, leading to better matches between products and consumers, and therefore improved product ratings. We show that when low-rated products start receiving Q&As, their subsequent ratings improve by approximately 0.5 stars. We further show that the extent of the rating increase due to Q&As is moderated by the degree of ex-ante fit uncertainty. Overall, our findings suggest that, by resolving product fit uncertainty in an e-commerce setting, the addition of Q&As can be a viable way for retailers to improve ratings and sales of low-rated products, particularly those products that have incurred low ratings due to customer-product fit mismatch.","PeriodicalId":287551,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3033274.3084087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, we study the question and answer (Q&A) feature of electronic commerce platforms, an increasingly common form of user-generated content (UGC) that allows consumers to publicly ask product-specific questions and receive responses, either from the platform or from other customers. Using data from a major online retailer, we show that Q&As complement reviews and ratings: unlike reviews, Q&As primarily happen pre-purchase, focus on clarification of product attributes (rather than discussion of quality), and convey fit-specific information in a sentiment-free way. Our main hypothesis is that Q&As mitigate product fit uncertainty, leading to better matches between products and consumers, and therefore improved product ratings. We show that when low-rated products start receiving Q&As, their subsequent ratings improve by approximately 0.5 stars. We further show that the extent of the rating increase due to Q&As is moderated by the degree of ex-ante fit uncertainty. Overall, our findings suggest that, by resolving product fit uncertainty in an e-commerce setting, the addition of Q&As can be a viable way for retailers to improve ratings and sales of low-rated products, particularly those products that have incurred low ratings due to customer-product fit mismatch.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交互用户生成内容技术:问答如何影响评分和评论
在本文中,我们研究了电子商务平台的问答(Q&A)功能,这是一种越来越普遍的用户生成内容(UGC)形式,允许消费者公开询问特定产品的问题,并从平台或其他客户那里获得答复。利用一家大型在线零售商的数据,我们发现问答是对评论和评级的补充:与评论不同,问答主要发生在购买前,侧重于澄清产品属性(而不是讨论质量),并以一种不带感情色彩的方式传达适合的特定信息。我们的主要假设是问答减轻了产品匹配的不确定性,导致产品和消费者之间更好的匹配,从而提高了产品评级。我们表明,当低评级的产品开始接受问答时,它们随后的评级提高了大约0.5颗星。我们进一步表明,问答引起的评级增加程度受到事前拟合不确定性程度的调节。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,通过解决电子商务环境中的产品匹配不确定性,添加问答可以成为零售商提高低评级产品的评级和销售的可行方法,特别是那些由于客户-产品匹配不匹配而导致评级较低的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential Function Minimizers of Combinatorial Congestion Games: Efficiency and Computation Making Right Decisions Based on Wrong Opinions Learning in the Repeated Secretary Problem Facilitating the Search for Partners on Matching Platforms: Restricting Agent Actions Deferred-Acceptance Auctions for Multiple Levels of Service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1