Does the modern code inspection have value?

Harvey P. Siy, L. Votta
{"title":"Does the modern code inspection have value?","authors":"Harvey P. Siy, L. Votta","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2001.972741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For years, it was believed that the value of inspections is in finding and fixing defects early in the development process. Otherwise, the cost to find and fix them later is much higher However in examining code inspection data, we are finding that inspections are beneficial for an additional reason. They make the code easier to understand and change. An analysis of data from a recent code inspection experiment shows that 60% of all issues raised in the code inspections are not problems that could have been uncovered by latter phases of testing or field usage because they have little or nothing to do with the visible execution behavior of the software. Rather they improve the maintainability of the code by making the code conform to coding standards, minimizing redundancies, improving language proficiency, improving safety and portability, and raising the quality of the documentation. We conclude that even if advances in software technology have diminished the value of inspections as a defect detection tool, in most cases, it continues to be of value as a maintenance tool.","PeriodicalId":160032,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2001.972741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

For years, it was believed that the value of inspections is in finding and fixing defects early in the development process. Otherwise, the cost to find and fix them later is much higher However in examining code inspection data, we are finding that inspections are beneficial for an additional reason. They make the code easier to understand and change. An analysis of data from a recent code inspection experiment shows that 60% of all issues raised in the code inspections are not problems that could have been uncovered by latter phases of testing or field usage because they have little or nothing to do with the visible execution behavior of the software. Rather they improve the maintainability of the code by making the code conform to coding standards, minimizing redundancies, improving language proficiency, improving safety and portability, and raising the quality of the documentation. We conclude that even if advances in software technology have diminished the value of inspections as a defect detection tool, in most cases, it continues to be of value as a maintenance tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代代码检查有价值吗?
多年来,人们一直认为检查的价值在于在开发过程的早期发现并修复缺陷。否则,稍后查找和修复它们的成本要高得多。然而,在检查代码检查数据时,我们发现检查是有益的,还有一个额外的原因。它们使代码更容易理解和更改。对最近一次代码检查实验的数据分析表明,在代码检查中提出的所有问题中,有60%不是可以在测试或字段使用的后期阶段发现的问题,因为它们与软件的可见执行行为几乎没有关系。相反,它们通过使代码符合编码标准、最小化冗余、提高语言熟练程度、提高安全性和可移植性以及提高文档质量来提高代码的可维护性。我们得出结论,即使软件技术的进步已经降低了作为缺陷检测工具的检查的价值,在大多数情况下,它仍然是作为维护工具的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automating language conversion: a case study (an extended abstract) A metric framework for the assessment of object-oriented systems Dynamic and static views of software evolution Multi-view architecture trend analysis for medical imaging Bayesian analysis of software cost and quality models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1