Copyright Law Enforcement in Online Environment

Yang Sun
{"title":"Copyright Law Enforcement in Online Environment","authors":"Yang Sun","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2432987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among a variety of enforcement strategies, copyright law enforcement function as strongest safeguard to control and eliminate copyright infringement. As traditional strategy, copyright law enforcement is fundamentally distinguished from the first type by DRM system. Because copyright law enforcement is primarily operated by judicial system and government agencies, such type of model is more powerful and overwhelming than the technology-based DRM system with respect to online copyright enforcement. In general, the copyright law enforcement system remedy the losses of copyright owners and punish infringement as an ex post enforcement strategy. Although both judicial system and the enforcement by government agencies require certain procedures and additional costs to copyright owners, the legal protection provided by copyright law enforcement is usually ultimate and determinative. Due to the reliability, copyright owners have long relied on copyright law enforcement as the major strategy to enforce their copyright throughout history. The copyright law enforcement is not a single definition. Rather, the law enforcement generally consists of civil remedies and criminal enforcement. Basically, civil remedies are granted by courts under judicial system pursuant to copyright statutes. Criminal enforcement, on the other hand, is the result of cooperation by government agencies and courts.","PeriodicalId":208710,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Patent Law/Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Patent Law/Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among a variety of enforcement strategies, copyright law enforcement function as strongest safeguard to control and eliminate copyright infringement. As traditional strategy, copyright law enforcement is fundamentally distinguished from the first type by DRM system. Because copyright law enforcement is primarily operated by judicial system and government agencies, such type of model is more powerful and overwhelming than the technology-based DRM system with respect to online copyright enforcement. In general, the copyright law enforcement system remedy the losses of copyright owners and punish infringement as an ex post enforcement strategy. Although both judicial system and the enforcement by government agencies require certain procedures and additional costs to copyright owners, the legal protection provided by copyright law enforcement is usually ultimate and determinative. Due to the reliability, copyright owners have long relied on copyright law enforcement as the major strategy to enforce their copyright throughout history. The copyright law enforcement is not a single definition. Rather, the law enforcement generally consists of civil remedies and criminal enforcement. Basically, civil remedies are granted by courts under judicial system pursuant to copyright statutes. Criminal enforcement, on the other hand, is the result of cooperation by government agencies and courts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络环境下的著作权执法
在各种执法策略中,著作权执法是控制和消除著作权侵权的最有力保障。作为传统的版权执法策略,DRM制度与前者有着根本的区别。由于版权执法主要由司法系统和政府机构运作,因此这种模式在在线版权执法方面比基于技术的DRM系统更强大,更具压倒性。一般来说,著作权执法制度是弥补著作权人的损失,惩罚侵权行为的一种事后执法策略。虽然司法系统和政府机构的执法都需要一定的程序和版权所有者的额外费用,但版权执法提供的法律保护通常是最终的和决定性的。由于其可靠性,著作权人在历史上一直将著作权执法作为著作权保护的主要策略。版权法的实施并不是一个单一的定义。相反,执法一般包括民事救济和刑事执法。基本上,民事救济是由司法制度下的法院根据著作权法给予的。另一方面,刑事执法是政府机构和法院合作的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FRAND in India Patent Citations - An Analysis of Quality Differences and Citing Practices in Hybrid Corn Licensing with Patent Competition The Logic of International Intellectual Property Protection Modeling Software Piracy Protection: Monopoly versus Duopoly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1