Labour cost disclosures: have IFRSs made a difference?

Sang Ho Kim, D. Taylor
{"title":"Labour cost disclosures: have IFRSs made a difference?","authors":"Sang Ho Kim, D. Taylor","doi":"10.1108/14013381111157346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper aims to investigate changes in corporate disclosures of labour‐related costs in financial statements arising from a change in the accounting regime from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAPs) to international financial reporting standards (IFRSs) in Australia.Design/methodology/approach – An archival empirical approach is taken. Data are sampled for 160 listed companies in Australia over seven years covering Australian GAAPs (2003‐2005) and Australian IFRSs (2006‐2009) periods. To measure disclosures, a classification and count is made of line items for labour‐related costs found on the face of and in the notes to financial statements. These disclosures are analysed against firm‐specific characteristics and industry categories.Findings – Results reveal companies disclosing “total labour costs” rose from about 60‐85 per cent, and the discretionary disaggregation of “total labour costs” became more prevalent. Companies providing disaggregated information in the post‐IFRSs peri...","PeriodicalId":119134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14013381111157346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate changes in corporate disclosures of labour‐related costs in financial statements arising from a change in the accounting regime from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAPs) to international financial reporting standards (IFRSs) in Australia.Design/methodology/approach – An archival empirical approach is taken. Data are sampled for 160 listed companies in Australia over seven years covering Australian GAAPs (2003‐2005) and Australian IFRSs (2006‐2009) periods. To measure disclosures, a classification and count is made of line items for labour‐related costs found on the face of and in the notes to financial statements. These disclosures are analysed against firm‐specific characteristics and industry categories.Findings – Results reveal companies disclosing “total labour costs” rose from about 60‐85 per cent, and the discretionary disaggregation of “total labour costs” became more prevalent. Companies providing disaggregated information in the post‐IFRSs peri...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳动力成本披露:国际财务报告准则有影响吗?
目的-本文旨在调查澳大利亚会计制度从公认会计原则(gaap)到国际财务报告准则(ifrs)的变化所引起的财务报表中企业劳动力相关成本披露的变化。设计/方法/方法-采用档案经验方法。数据取样于澳大利亚160家上市公司,历时七年,涵盖澳大利亚公认会计准则(2003 - 2005)和澳大利亚国际财务报告准则(2006 - 2009)期间。为了衡量披露情况,对财务报表附注表面和附注中的人工相关成本分项进行分类和计数。这些披露是针对公司特定特征和行业类别进行分析的。调查结果-调查结果显示,披露“总劳动力成本”的公司比例从60% - 85%上升,“总劳动力成本”的随意分类变得更加普遍。在国际财务报告准则之后提供分类信息的公司……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of human resources in business model performance: The case of network-based companies A value case methodology to enable a transition towards generative health management: A case study from The Netherlands The analysis of intellectual capital evolution: a perspective on research Management control of work‐life balance. A narrative study of an Australian financial institution Bullying in context: a risk management perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1