Evolution of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Multiport to Single Port

O. Karakuş, Oktay Ulusoy
{"title":"Evolution of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: From Multiport to Single Port","authors":"O. Karakuş, Oktay Ulusoy","doi":"10.17795/MINSURGERY-36366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Laparoscopic approach with its several techniques has become the standard method for cholecystectomy over the past decades. As technical instruments have improved and varied, the interest in endoscopic surgery has turned towards minimal invasive single site access surgery with fewer instruments, thus resulting in minimal pain, minimal scarring and better cosmesis. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic literature searching of databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was done from 1982 and updated in December 2015. Search terms were “cholecystectomy”, “laparoscopic cholecystectomy”, “four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy”, “single-incision laparoscopic surgery”. Results: Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was accepted as the “gold standard” in the treatment of patients with cholelithiasis before millennium. Thereafter, two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was reported as a novel, safe and rapid method of gallbladder removal in consecutive reports. Single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy with non-conventional multi-channel port method was first introduced as an alternative to the standard multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adult patients in the last decade. Success rates of performing conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy were ranging from 93% to 100% and single site laparoscopic cholecystectomy was ranging from 84% to 100%. Conclusions: Currently, it has been widely accepted that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for cholecystectomy. Although single site laparoscopic cholecystectomy is becoming more popular with the recent advancements, conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy is being widely used as the primary treatment modality for the gallbladder removal.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/MINSURGERY-36366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Laparoscopic approach with its several techniques has become the standard method for cholecystectomy over the past decades. As technical instruments have improved and varied, the interest in endoscopic surgery has turned towards minimal invasive single site access surgery with fewer instruments, thus resulting in minimal pain, minimal scarring and better cosmesis. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic literature searching of databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was done from 1982 and updated in December 2015. Search terms were “cholecystectomy”, “laparoscopic cholecystectomy”, “four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy”, “single-incision laparoscopic surgery”. Results: Four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was accepted as the “gold standard” in the treatment of patients with cholelithiasis before millennium. Thereafter, two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was reported as a novel, safe and rapid method of gallbladder removal in consecutive reports. Single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy with non-conventional multi-channel port method was first introduced as an alternative to the standard multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adult patients in the last decade. Success rates of performing conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy were ranging from 93% to 100% and single site laparoscopic cholecystectomy was ranging from 84% to 100%. Conclusions: Currently, it has been widely accepted that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for cholecystectomy. Although single site laparoscopic cholecystectomy is becoming more popular with the recent advancements, conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy is being widely used as the primary treatment modality for the gallbladder removal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术的发展:从多腔到单腔
背景:在过去的几十年里,腹腔镜入路及其几种技术已成为胆囊切除术的标准方法。随着技术器械的改进和多样化,对内窥镜手术的兴趣已经转向微创单部位手术,使用更少的器械,从而产生最小的疼痛,最小的疤痕和更好的美容。证据获取:从1982年开始对MEDLINE、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar数据库进行系统文献检索,并于2015年12月更新。检索词为“胆囊切除术”、“腹腔镜胆囊切除术”、“四口腹腔镜胆囊切除术”、“单切口腹腔镜手术”。结果:千年前,四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术被公认为治疗胆石症的“金标准”。此后,连续报道双孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为一种新颖、安全、快速的胆囊切除方法。近十年来,非传统多通道通道单部位腹腔镜胆囊切除术首次作为标准多通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术的替代方案被引入成人患者。常规四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成功率为93% ~ 100%,单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成功率为84% ~ 100%。结论:目前,腹腔镜胆囊切除术已被广泛认为是胆囊切除术的金标准。尽管近年来单部位腹腔镜胆囊切除术越来越受欢迎,但传统的多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术仍是胆囊切除术的主要治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Key Methods to Increase the Success Rate of Endoscopic Repair of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Marginal Ulcer After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Case Report and Review of Literature Meshoma, a Rare Complication of Abdomen and Hernia Repair-A Case Report Successful Removal of a Pulmonary Foreign Body Using C-Arm-Guided Flexible Bronchoscopy from Distal Airways of a Seven-Year-Old Boy: A Case Report Rectal Indomethacin Versus Rectal Diclofenac Sodium for Reducing Pain Associated with Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1