Deep Learning-based Approach on sgRNA off-target Prediction in CRISPR/Cas9

Alyssa Imani, Jonathan Valiant, Alexander Agung Santoso Gunawan
{"title":"Deep Learning-based Approach on sgRNA off-target Prediction in CRISPR/Cas9","authors":"Alyssa Imani, Jonathan Valiant, Alexander Agung Santoso Gunawan","doi":"10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CRISPR/Cas9 as a gene editing tool has been widely applied in many organisms. However unintended mutation caused by sgRNA off-target effect is still possible to occur while implementing CRISPR/Cas9. To reduce the off-target possibility some researchers already develop deep learning models to predict the sgRNA off-target to the corresponding DNA target. Those models implement deep learning approaches such as CNN and embedding to compute and obtain the off-target scores. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare five different combination models of Word2Vec embedding and CNN to find which one is the best for predicting off-target sgRNA in classification schema. The final result shows that a combination of Word2Vec embedding and biLSTM in CNN model can achieve auROC and auPRC score of 99.61% and 86.67% respectively, which is better than CnnCRISPR model that was used as the reference for model architecture in this study. By comparing five different models, the highest accuracy achieved in this experiment reached 99.67%.","PeriodicalId":256184,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 as a gene editing tool has been widely applied in many organisms. However unintended mutation caused by sgRNA off-target effect is still possible to occur while implementing CRISPR/Cas9. To reduce the off-target possibility some researchers already develop deep learning models to predict the sgRNA off-target to the corresponding DNA target. Those models implement deep learning approaches such as CNN and embedding to compute and obtain the off-target scores. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare five different combination models of Word2Vec embedding and CNN to find which one is the best for predicting off-target sgRNA in classification schema. The final result shows that a combination of Word2Vec embedding and biLSTM in CNN model can achieve auROC and auPRC score of 99.61% and 86.67% respectively, which is better than CnnCRISPR model that was used as the reference for model architecture in this study. By comparing five different models, the highest accuracy achieved in this experiment reached 99.67%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习的CRISPR/Cas9中sgRNA脱靶预测方法
CRISPR/Cas9作为一种基因编辑工具在许多生物中得到了广泛的应用。然而,在实施CRISPR/Cas9时,仍有可能发生sgRNA脱靶效应引起的意外突变。为了减少脱靶的可能性,一些研究人员已经开发了深度学习模型来预测sgRNA脱靶到相应的DNA靶标。这些模型实现了CNN和嵌入等深度学习方法来计算和获得脱靶分数。因此,本研究的目的是比较Word2Vec嵌入和CNN的五种不同组合模型,找出哪种模型最适合预测分类模式中的脱靶sgRNA。最终结果表明,在CNN模型中结合Word2Vec嵌入和biLSTM可以分别获得99.61%和86.67%的auROC和auPRC得分,优于本研究模型架构参考的CnnCRISPR模型。通过对比5种不同的模型,本实验的最高准确率达到99.67%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Customer Relationship Management, Customer Retention, and the Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction on a Healthcare Mobile Applications Revalidating the Encoder-Decoder Depths and Activation Function to Find Optimum Vanilla Transformer Model Goertzel Algorithm Design on Field Programmable Gate Arrays For Implementing Electric Power Measurement Instagram vs TikTok: Which Engage Best for Consumer Brand Engagement for Social Commerce and Purchase Intention? Air Pollution Prediction using Random Forest Classifier: A Case Study of DKI Jakarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1