Valuing the Economic Consequences of Work Injury and Illness: A Comparison of Methods and Findings

D. Weil
{"title":"Valuing the Economic Consequences of Work Injury and Illness: A Comparison of Methods and Findings","authors":"D. Weil","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.189839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nWorkplace injuries and fatalities in the US create significant economic costs to society. Although economic costs should measure the opportunity cost to society arising from injuries and fatalities, estimating them often proves difficult as a practical matter. This leads to a range of estimates for valuing these costs.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis paper compares methods of economic valuation, focusing in particular on how different methods diverge to varying degrees from measuring the \"true\" economic costs of injuries and illnesses. In so doing, it surveys the literature that has arisen in the past 25 years to measure different aspects of economic consequences.\n\n\nRESULTS\nEstimates of the costs of injuries and fatalities tend to understate the true economic costs from a social welfare perspective, particularly in how they account for occupational fatalities and losses arising from work disabilities.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nAlthough data availability often makes estimation of social welfare costs difficult, researchers should attempt to more fully integrate such approaches into estimation procedures and interpretation of their results.","PeriodicalId":168354,"journal":{"name":"Torts & Products Liability Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"112","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Torts & Products Liability Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.189839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112

Abstract

BACKGROUND Workplace injuries and fatalities in the US create significant economic costs to society. Although economic costs should measure the opportunity cost to society arising from injuries and fatalities, estimating them often proves difficult as a practical matter. This leads to a range of estimates for valuing these costs. METHODS This paper compares methods of economic valuation, focusing in particular on how different methods diverge to varying degrees from measuring the "true" economic costs of injuries and illnesses. In so doing, it surveys the literature that has arisen in the past 25 years to measure different aspects of economic consequences. RESULTS Estimates of the costs of injuries and fatalities tend to understate the true economic costs from a social welfare perspective, particularly in how they account for occupational fatalities and losses arising from work disabilities. CONCLUSION Although data availability often makes estimation of social welfare costs difficult, researchers should attempt to more fully integrate such approaches into estimation procedures and interpretation of their results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估工伤和疾病的经济后果:方法和结果的比较
在美国,工作场所的伤害和死亡给社会带来了巨大的经济成本。虽然经济成本应该衡量伤害和死亡给社会带来的机会成本,但作为一个实际问题,估计它们往往证明是困难的。这导致了评估这些成本的一系列估计。方法本文比较了经济评估的方法,特别关注不同的方法如何在不同程度上偏离测量伤害和疾病的“真实”经济成本。在此过程中,它调查了过去25年出现的文献,以衡量经济后果的不同方面。结果:从社会福利的角度来看,对伤害和死亡成本的估计往往低估了真正的经济成本,特别是在如何计算职业死亡和因工作残疾造成的损失方面。结论:虽然数据的可用性往往使社会福利成本的估计变得困难,但研究人员应该尝试更充分地将这些方法整合到估计程序和结果的解释中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Dynamic Model of Lawsuit Joinder and Settlement Quantitative Proof of Reputational Harm Injuries, Damages and a Puzzle: Can an Effect Ever Precede its Cause Efficiency, Fairness, and the Economic Analysis of Tort Law Fault at the Contract-Tort Interface
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1