Identifying Concerns On Automatic Tools For Accessibility Assessment: A Comparative Case Study On Two Portuguese Universities' Websites

João Dias, Diana Carvalho, Arsénio Reis, J. Barroso, Tânia Rocha
{"title":"Identifying Concerns On Automatic Tools For Accessibility Assessment: A Comparative Case Study On Two Portuguese Universities' Websites","authors":"João Dias, Diana Carvalho, Arsénio Reis, J. Barroso, Tânia Rocha","doi":"10.1109/ICICT55905.2022.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose for conducting this research is to analyze the core advantages and disadvantages of automatic assessment tools. With this in mind, we considered two different web sites of two distinct Portuguese Universities and compare the accessibility and usability issues found, aiming at identifying core problems through errors / warnings. This outcome will help us understand the weaknesses of such automatic tools and, thus, suggest features that could be added to improve their analysis. These findings will serve as a basis for a proposal of a new type of platform capable of making any web or mobile application accessible to all types of users, regardless of their impairments (e.g., blindness, deafness, motor or intellectual disabilities).","PeriodicalId":273927,"journal":{"name":"2022 5th International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 5th International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICT55905.2022.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The main purpose for conducting this research is to analyze the core advantages and disadvantages of automatic assessment tools. With this in mind, we considered two different web sites of two distinct Portuguese Universities and compare the accessibility and usability issues found, aiming at identifying core problems through errors / warnings. This outcome will help us understand the weaknesses of such automatic tools and, thus, suggest features that could be added to improve their analysis. These findings will serve as a basis for a proposal of a new type of platform capable of making any web or mobile application accessible to all types of users, regardless of their impairments (e.g., blindness, deafness, motor or intellectual disabilities).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可访问性评估中对自动工具的关注:两所葡萄牙大学网站的比较案例研究
进行本研究的主要目的是分析自动评估工具的核心优缺点。考虑到这一点,我们考虑了两所不同的葡萄牙大学的两个不同的网站,并比较了发现的可访问性和可用性问题,旨在通过错误/警告识别核心问题。这个结果将帮助我们理解这些自动工具的弱点,从而建议可以添加哪些特性来改进它们的分析。这些发现将作为一种新型平台的基础,这种平台能够使任何网络或移动应用程序对所有类型的用户都可访问,而不管他们的缺陷(例如,失明、耳聋、运动或智力残疾)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review of the State-of-the-Art of Sensing and Actuation Technology for Robotic Grasping and Haptic Rendering ICU Patient Status Prediction Using Markov Chain Model Knowledge-based Interactive Configuration Tool for Industrial Augmented Reality Systems EnsembleNet: An improved COVID19 Prediction Model using Chest X-Ray Images Social Engineering Detection Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1