Implementation and Maintenance of a Pediatric Severe Burn Guidelines Quality Improvement Project

Kristin J. Dolan, Jennifer L. Flint, Tara Benton, Mikaela Miller, Jenna O. Miller
{"title":"Implementation and Maintenance of a Pediatric Severe Burn Guidelines Quality Improvement Project","authors":"Kristin J. Dolan, Jennifer L. Flint, Tara Benton, Mikaela Miller, Jenna O. Miller","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Critically injured pediatric burn patients require specialized management, yet few verified pediatric burn centers exist in the United States. Many pediatric hospitals have resources to care for severely burned patients but lack standardized care guidelines, which improve outcomes. To improve the morbidity and mortality of severely burned pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, we created a specialized burn team. We implemented Pediatric Severe Burn Guidelines, focusing on improving fluid resuscitation accuracy and providing timely nutritional support. Methods: This investigation is of a 9-year (2010–2019) retrospective preintervention and postintervention study of the effect of the formation of a multidisciplinary burn leadership committee and development and implementation of Pediatric Severe Burn Guidelines. The primary outcome measures are increasing the accuracy of fluid resuscitation and improving the timely administration of nutritional support. The process measure is the percentage of time the electronic health record power plan was used for burn admissions with burn leadership review of the cases. Balancing measures are pediatric intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Results: Preprotocol patients received acceptable fluid resuscitation 25% (5/20) of the time compared to 61.5% (8/13) of the time in postprotocol patients (P = 0.04). In postprotocol patients, there is an improvement in the timely placement of postpyloric feeding tube and initiation of feeds 48 hours after admission. Conclusions: Extensive guidelines for standardized care require careful implementation and monitoring of adherence gaps. Creating a specialized burn team and implementing clinical guidelines standardize care leading to improvement in critical patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":343243,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Quality and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Critically injured pediatric burn patients require specialized management, yet few verified pediatric burn centers exist in the United States. Many pediatric hospitals have resources to care for severely burned patients but lack standardized care guidelines, which improve outcomes. To improve the morbidity and mortality of severely burned pediatric patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, we created a specialized burn team. We implemented Pediatric Severe Burn Guidelines, focusing on improving fluid resuscitation accuracy and providing timely nutritional support. Methods: This investigation is of a 9-year (2010–2019) retrospective preintervention and postintervention study of the effect of the formation of a multidisciplinary burn leadership committee and development and implementation of Pediatric Severe Burn Guidelines. The primary outcome measures are increasing the accuracy of fluid resuscitation and improving the timely administration of nutritional support. The process measure is the percentage of time the electronic health record power plan was used for burn admissions with burn leadership review of the cases. Balancing measures are pediatric intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Results: Preprotocol patients received acceptable fluid resuscitation 25% (5/20) of the time compared to 61.5% (8/13) of the time in postprotocol patients (P = 0.04). In postprotocol patients, there is an improvement in the timely placement of postpyloric feeding tube and initiation of feeds 48 hours after admission. Conclusions: Extensive guidelines for standardized care require careful implementation and monitoring of adherence gaps. Creating a specialized burn team and implementing clinical guidelines standardize care leading to improvement in critical patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施和维护儿童严重烧伤指南质量改进项目
简介:重伤儿童烧伤患者需要专门的管理,但很少有经过验证的儿童烧伤中心存在于美国。许多儿科医院有资源来照顾严重烧伤的患者,但缺乏标准化的护理指南,这可以改善结果。为了提高儿科重症监护病房收治的严重烧伤患儿的发病率和死亡率,我们成立了一个专门的烧伤小组。我们实施了《小儿严重烧伤指南》,重点是提高液体复苏的准确性和提供及时的营养支持。方法:本研究是一项为期9年(2010-2019)的回顾性干预前和干预后研究,研究了组建多学科烧伤领导委员会和制定和实施儿科严重烧伤指南的效果。主要结果措施是提高液体复苏的准确性和改善营养支持的及时管理。过程度量是电子健康记录电源计划用于烧伤入院和烧伤领导审查病例的时间百分比。平衡措施是儿科重症监护病房和住院时间。结果:方案前患者接受可接受液体复苏的比例为25%(5/20),方案后患者接受可接受液体复苏的比例为61.5% (8/13)(P = 0.04)。在方案后患者中,及时放置幽门后喂食管和入院后48小时开始进食的情况有所改善。结论:广泛的标准化护理指南需要仔细实施和监测依从性差距。建立一个专门的烧伤小组,实施临床指南,使护理标准化,从而改善危重患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Wait Times for Children with Caregivers with Limited English Proficiency in the Emergency Department Utilizing Clinical Decision Support in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection across a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network Pediatric Inpatient Leaders, Views Changed with COVID-19: A Call to Re-engage in Quality Improvement Qualitative Study on Safe and Effective Handover Information during a Rapid Response Team Encounter New strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Use in the NICU: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1