Ambiguity as a Means for triggering Civic Participation

Jennifer L. Schubert
{"title":"Ambiguity as a Means for triggering Civic Participation","authors":"Jennifer L. Schubert","doi":"10.1145/3363384.3363484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper builds on the dimensions of ambiguity, as stated in the article by Gaver et al. [1]. It proposes to transfer the phenomenon of ambiguity to the domains of Social and Public Design, which are not only in need of generating attention in public spaces but also in funnelling long-term interest to deploy citizen participation. This paper discusses the categories of ambiguity on a theoretical level and adds relevant Research-Through-Design case studies that examine design knowledge in practice.","PeriodicalId":281851,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper builds on the dimensions of ambiguity, as stated in the article by Gaver et al. [1]. It proposes to transfer the phenomenon of ambiguity to the domains of Social and Public Design, which are not only in need of generating attention in public spaces but also in funnelling long-term interest to deploy citizen participation. This paper discusses the categories of ambiguity on a theoretical level and adds relevant Research-Through-Design case studies that examine design knowledge in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模糊作为触发公民参与的手段
本文以Gaver等人[1]的文章所述的歧义维度为基础。它建议将模棱两可的现象转移到社会和公共设计领域,这不仅需要在公共空间中引起关注,而且需要汇集长期利益以部署公民参与。本文在理论层面上讨论了歧义的类别,并添加了相关的通过设计研究的案例研究,以检验实践中的设计知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entangled Ethnography: Towards a collective future understanding Imagining the Cool-ag: Or, Freedom Considered Harmful 5 Percent Piano: An Augmented Piano with Playful Audio Response Exploring the Sensed and Unexpected: Not Looking in Gaze Interaction Towards a Network of Practices: Identifying Central Elements to Inform Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1