ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION AND THE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF UKRAINE AS REVISED IN 2017: IS IT A NEW SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM OR THE OLD UNRESOLVED CHALLENGES?

V. Bevzenko
{"title":"ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION AND THE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF UKRAINE AS REVISED IN 2017: IS IT A NEW SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM OR THE OLD UNRESOLVED CHALLENGES?","authors":"V. Bevzenko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-117-9/2-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Full exercise of the right to appeal against a court decision, actions or inaction of state authorities, local self-government bodies, officials and officers (Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine) 1 , the right to a fair justice 2 as well as successful protection of rights, freedoms, interests provide for the obligatory consideration of actual and normative preconditions. Such preconditions function as peculiar “filters”, since they prevent the unreasonable justice, preventing the court from considering and resolving inappropriate or unjustified disputes. Although these preconditions-filters have their own nature, content and peculiarities, all of them determine the prospective of appealing to the court as well as opportunity for further protection of rights, freedoms and interests. Absence or non-conformity of one of such preconditions will make the opening of proceeding in a legal case, satisfaction of claim requirements complicated or even impossible, as well as preventing from legal proceedings in general. It is considered that the preconditions for the protection of rights, freedoms, and interests of administrative-legal relations in administrative procedure are as follows 3 4 . 1) The compliance of all actual circumstances of the administrativelegal dispute with the criteria of administrative jurisdiction;","PeriodicalId":226973,"journal":{"name":"THE OPTIMIZATION OF PROTECTION MODEL FOR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF UKRAINIAN PERSON","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE OPTIMIZATION OF PROTECTION MODEL FOR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF UKRAINIAN PERSON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-117-9/2-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Full exercise of the right to appeal against a court decision, actions or inaction of state authorities, local self-government bodies, officials and officers (Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine) 1 , the right to a fair justice 2 as well as successful protection of rights, freedoms, interests provide for the obligatory consideration of actual and normative preconditions. Such preconditions function as peculiar “filters”, since they prevent the unreasonable justice, preventing the court from considering and resolving inappropriate or unjustified disputes. Although these preconditions-filters have their own nature, content and peculiarities, all of them determine the prospective of appealing to the court as well as opportunity for further protection of rights, freedoms and interests. Absence or non-conformity of one of such preconditions will make the opening of proceeding in a legal case, satisfaction of claim requirements complicated or even impossible, as well as preventing from legal proceedings in general. It is considered that the preconditions for the protection of rights, freedoms, and interests of administrative-legal relations in administrative procedure are as follows 3 4 . 1) The compliance of all actual circumstances of the administrativelegal dispute with the criteria of administrative jurisdiction;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017年修订的乌克兰行政管辖权和行政诉讼法典:是问题的新解决方案还是未解决的旧挑战?
充分行使对法院判决、国家机关、地方自治机关、官员和官员的作为或不作为的上诉权利(乌克兰宪法第55条)1、获得公正正义的权利2以及对权利、自由和利益的成功保护,规定了必须考虑实际和规范的先决条件。这些先决条件起到特殊的“过滤器”作用,防止不合理的司法,阻止法院审理和解决不适当或不合理的纠纷。虽然这些先决条件过滤器各有其性质、内容和特点,但它们都决定了向法院上诉的前景以及进一步保护权利、自由和利益的机会。缺乏或不符合这些先决条件之一将使法律案件的诉讼程序的启动,索赔要求的满足变得复杂甚至不可能,并在一般情况下阻止法律诉讼。认为行政诉讼中行政法律关系的权利、自由和利益得到保障的前提是:(一)行政法律纠纷的全部实际情况符合行政管辖标准;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PECULIARITIES OF CRIMINAL REGULATION OF COERCIN TO MARRIAGE PROVIDED BY ARTICLE 151-2 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE PROBLEMS OF DISTRIBUTION OF STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN UKRAINE COLLEGIAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE SUBJECTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AS PARTIES TO A CASE (A PLAINTIFF, A DEFENDANT, AND THE THIRD PERSON) CRIMINAL LEGAL POLICY IN COUNTERACTION TO CRIMES AGAINST OWNERSHIP AS A BASIS FOR OWNERSHIP PROTECTION IN UKRAINE ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION AND THE CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF UKRAINE AS REVISED IN 2017: IS IT A NEW SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM OR THE OLD UNRESOLVED CHALLENGES?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1