On the Consideration of the Procedures to Challenge Arbitrators in the Egyptian Arbitration Law as Mandatory and the Ability to Appeal Decisions Made by Arbitral Institutions. A Commentary on the Cair

D. Hussein
{"title":"On the Consideration of the Procedures to Challenge Arbitrators in the Egyptian Arbitration Law as Mandatory and the Ability to Appeal Decisions Made by Arbitral Institutions. A Commentary on the Cair","authors":"D. Hussein","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2016016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Cairo Court of Appeal rendered an important decision regarding an arbitral tribunal’s decision on the challenge of an arbitrator, concluding that the procedures to challenge arbitrators provided for in the Egyptian Arbitration Law are not part of public policy. The Court thus rejected the party’s request to set aside the challenge decision and refused to examine it before the issuance of the final award.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cairo Court of Appeal rendered an important decision regarding an arbitral tribunal’s decision on the challenge of an arbitrator, concluding that the procedures to challenge arbitrators provided for in the Egyptian Arbitration Law are not part of public policy. The Court thus rejected the party’s request to set aside the challenge decision and refused to examine it before the issuance of the final award.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论埃及仲裁法中对仲裁员的质疑程序的强制性及对仲裁机构裁决的上诉能力。《对会议的评论
开罗上诉法院就仲裁法庭对一名仲裁员提出质疑的决定作出了一项重要裁决,认为《埃及仲裁法》规定的质疑仲裁员的程序不是公共政策的一部分。因此,法院驳回了当事方关于搁置质疑决定的请求,并拒绝在发布最终裁决之前对其进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changed Circumstances and Oil and Gas Contracts Aramco: The Story of the World’s Most Valuable Oil Concession and Its Landmark Arbitration Petroleum Concessions in Egypt: A Recipe for Disputes? Stabilization Clauses: Do They Have a Future? COVID-19 and the Exceptions to Contractual Liability in Arab Contract Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1