{"title":"On Not Seeing What Lies Open to View in Wittgenstein and Whitehead: A Response to Jerry H. Gill and Richard McDonough","authors":"Randy Ramal","doi":"10.5840/process20174612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this article, I discuss two recent accounts of potential philosophical links between Whitehead and Wittgenstein, one by Jerry H. Gill (Process Studies 43.1) and a response to it by Richard McDonough (Process Studies 45.2). I argue that Gill and McDonough fail to do full justice to the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and the nature of philosophy. I also argue that they miss an obvious link between Whitehead and Wittgenstein that would have made the engagement with their works more productive. Borrowing a metaphor from Wittgenstein, I argue that Gill and McDonough not only fail to see what is open to view regarding the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and philosophy, but also regarding their agreement on the transcendent nature of values as such.","PeriodicalId":315123,"journal":{"name":"Process Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/process20174612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this article, I discuss two recent accounts of potential philosophical links between Whitehead and Wittgenstein, one by Jerry H. Gill (Process Studies 43.1) and a response to it by Richard McDonough (Process Studies 45.2). I argue that Gill and McDonough fail to do full justice to the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and the nature of philosophy. I also argue that they miss an obvious link between Whitehead and Wittgenstein that would have made the engagement with their works more productive. Borrowing a metaphor from Wittgenstein, I argue that Gill and McDonough not only fail to see what is open to view regarding the views of Whitehead and Wittgenstein on language and philosophy, but also regarding their agreement on the transcendent nature of values as such.
在这篇文章中,我讨论了最近关于怀特黑德和维特根斯坦之间潜在的哲学联系的两种说法,一种是Jerry H. Gill的(过程研究43.1),另一种是Richard McDonough的回应(过程研究45.2)。我认为吉尔和麦克多诺没有完全公正地对待怀特黑德和维特根斯坦关于语言和哲学本质的观点。我还认为,他们忽略了怀特黑德和维特根斯坦之间的一个明显联系,而这种联系本可以使人们更有成效地参与他们的作品。借用维特根斯坦的比喻,我认为吉尔和麦克多诺不仅没有看到怀特黑德和维特根斯坦在语言和哲学方面的观点是开放的,而且也没有看到他们对价值的超越性的认同。