Evidential Objections to Theism

H. Philipse
{"title":"Evidential Objections to Theism","authors":"H. Philipse","doi":"10.1002/9781119119302.CH13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Christian and Muslim monotheists still endorse the contention of the apostle Paul that unbelievers are “without excuse,” since there would be sufficient evidence in the world for God’s existence and his “invisible nature” (Romans 1: 20). According to contemporary atheists such as me, however, the evidence available today against God’s existence vastly overwhelms the alleged evidence pro, if there can be evidence at all for such a thing. Therefore, well‐informed and intellectually honest human beings should become atheists. The aim of this article is to present some of the main evidential objections to theism. Before doing so, the topic should be defined more precisely. Which god or monotheism are we talking about? How can any evidence be relevant to the question whether the god of theism exists?","PeriodicalId":312724,"journal":{"name":"A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119119302.CH13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many Christian and Muslim monotheists still endorse the contention of the apostle Paul that unbelievers are “without excuse,” since there would be sufficient evidence in the world for God’s existence and his “invisible nature” (Romans 1: 20). According to contemporary atheists such as me, however, the evidence available today against God’s existence vastly overwhelms the alleged evidence pro, if there can be evidence at all for such a thing. Therefore, well‐informed and intellectually honest human beings should become atheists. The aim of this article is to present some of the main evidential objections to theism. Before doing so, the topic should be defined more precisely. Which god or monotheism are we talking about? How can any evidence be relevant to the question whether the god of theism exists?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有神论的证据反对
许多基督徒和穆斯林一神论者仍然赞同使徒保罗的论点,即不信的人“没有借口”,因为世界上有足够的证据证明神的存在和他“看不见的本性”(罗马书1:20)。然而,根据像我这样的当代无神论者的说法,今天反对上帝存在的证据远远压倒了所谓的支持上帝存在的证据,如果有证据的话。因此,见多识广、理智诚实的人应该成为无神论者。这篇文章的目的是提出一些主要的证据反对有神论。在这样做之前,应该更精确地定义主题。我们说的是哪个神还是一神论?有什么证据能与有神论的上帝是否存在有关呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Naturalism Postmodernism Meta‐Ethics Evidence Hume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1