Erosions of Settler State Recognition of Sovereignty and Reproductive Justice

Krista Benson
{"title":"Erosions of Settler State Recognition of Sovereignty and Reproductive Justice","authors":"Krista Benson","doi":"10.1353/ado.0.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I outline the importance of Reproductive Justice framing in understanding the broader impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and its impacts on adoption and foster care. From there, I explore another Supreme Court decision, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022), and its potential impact on Haaland v. Brackeen, a case that represents an explicit challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 which will be heard by the US Supreme Court in fall 2022.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, I outline the importance of Reproductive Justice framing in understanding the broader impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and its impacts on adoption and foster care. From there, I explore another Supreme Court decision, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022), and its potential impact on Haaland v. Brackeen, a case that represents an explicit challenge to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 which will be heard by the US Supreme Court in fall 2022.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民国家承认主权和生殖正义的侵蚀
在这篇文章中,我概述了生殖正义框架在理解多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织(2022)的更广泛影响及其对收养和寄养的影响方面的重要性。从那里,我探讨了另一个最高法院的判决,俄克拉荷马州诉卡斯特罗-韦尔塔(2022),以及它对哈兰德诉布拉肯的潜在影响,这是一个明确挑战1978年印度儿童福利法的案件,将在2022年秋季由美国最高法院审理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Dobbs Issue Taking Children: A History of American Terror by Laura Briggs, and: Legitimating Life: Adoption in the Age of Globalization and Biotechnology by Sonja van Wichelen (review) Originalism: Erasing Women from the Body Politic Separation, Sorrow, and Silence: What Birth Mothers and Birth Searching in Children’s Literature Can Teach Us About the Abortion v. Adoption Debate The Dobbs Decision and the (False) Adoption “Option,” A Personal Essay of “Ambiguous Loss”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1