Towards Utility-Based Prioritization of Requirements in Open Source Environments

A. Felfernig, Martin Stettinger, Müslüm Atas, Ralph Samer, Jennifer Nerlich, Simon Scholz, J. Tiihonen, M. Raatikainen
{"title":"Towards Utility-Based Prioritization of Requirements in Open Source Environments","authors":"A. Felfernig, Martin Stettinger, Müslüm Atas, Ralph Samer, Jennifer Nerlich, Simon Scholz, J. Tiihonen, M. Raatikainen","doi":"10.1109/RE.2018.00-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements Engineering in open source projects such as ECLIPSE faces the challenge of having to prioritize requirements for individual contributors in a more or less unobtrusive fashion. In contrast to conventional industrial software development projects, contributors in open source platforms can decide on their own which requirements to implement next. In this context, the main role of prioritization is to support contributors in figuring out the most relevant and interesting requirements to be implemented next and thus avoid time-consuming and inefficient search processes. In this paper, we show how utility-based prioritization approaches can be used to support contributors in conventional as well as in open source Requirements Engineering scenarios. As an example of an open source environment, we use BUGZILLA. In this context, we also show how dependencies can be taken into account in utility-based prioritization processes.","PeriodicalId":445032,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Requirements Engineering in open source projects such as ECLIPSE faces the challenge of having to prioritize requirements for individual contributors in a more or less unobtrusive fashion. In contrast to conventional industrial software development projects, contributors in open source platforms can decide on their own which requirements to implement next. In this context, the main role of prioritization is to support contributors in figuring out the most relevant and interesting requirements to be implemented next and thus avoid time-consuming and inefficient search processes. In this paper, we show how utility-based prioritization approaches can be used to support contributors in conventional as well as in open source Requirements Engineering scenarios. As an example of an open source environment, we use BUGZILLA. In this context, we also show how dependencies can be taken into account in utility-based prioritization processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在开源环境中实现基于效用的需求优先级
像ECLIPSE这样的开源项目中的需求工程面临着这样的挑战:必须以一种或多或少不引人注目的方式为单个贡献者确定需求的优先级。与传统的工业软件开发项目相比,开源平台中的贡献者可以自己决定下一步要实现哪些需求。在这种情况下,优先级的主要作用是支持贡献者找出接下来要实现的最相关和最有趣的需求,从而避免耗时和低效的搜索过程。在本文中,我们展示了如何使用基于效用的优先化方法来支持传统的和开放源码需求工程场景中的贡献者。作为一个开源环境的例子,我们使用BUGZILLA。在此上下文中,我们还将展示如何在基于实用程序的优先级排序过程中考虑依赖关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CaRE: A Refinement Calculus for Requirements Engineering Based on Argumentation Semantics The Grace Period Has Ended: An Approach to Operationalize GDPR Requirements The Manager Perspective on Requirements Impact on Automotive Systems Development Speed Data Driven Requirements Engineering: Implications for the Community [Publisher's information]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1