Cross-National Variation in the Predictors of Wellbeing: Life Domains and Positive Personality Traits

Jonathan Fonberg, Andrew P. Smith
{"title":"Cross-National Variation in the Predictors of Wellbeing: Life Domains and Positive Personality Traits","authors":"Jonathan Fonberg, Andrew P. Smith","doi":"10.47752/sjss.42.65.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previous research has demonstrated cross-national variation in domain-life satisfaction relationships, with neither health, family, social life, personal safety, financial situation, home life or job satisfaction being universal predictors of wellbeing. The largest limitation of this previous research was a lack of appropriate control variables. Past research has shown that personality traits are powerful predictors of wellbeing, with three particularly important constructs being self-esteem, optimism and self-efficacy. Aims: The present study examined whether after controlling for positive personality traits, domain-life satisfaction relationships would vary cross-nationally and whether a direct cross-national comparison of domain-life satisfaction would reveal significant differences. It was predicted that the cross-national differences would be smaller than those found using more countries with greater cross-cultural differences. Methods: These hypotheses were tested using an online survey with samples from the USA and India, recruited using Mechanical Turk. Results: Both hypotheses were supported in that there was cross-national variation in domain-life satisfaction relationships, even after controlling for positive personality traits. In the Indian sample, health, financial and job satisfaction predicted life satisfaction. Amongst Americans, family, social life, financial situation and home satisfaction predicted it. Direct comparison revealed significant differences in the predictive power of home and job satisfaction, supporting the second hypothesis. As expected, the differences noted in this study were smaller than those revealed through our analysis of the World Values Scale and Eurobarometer. Conclusions: Domain life satisfaction relationships vary cross-nationally, even when personality traits are controlled.","PeriodicalId":149636,"journal":{"name":"Sumerianz Journal of Social Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sumerianz Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47752/sjss.42.65.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has demonstrated cross-national variation in domain-life satisfaction relationships, with neither health, family, social life, personal safety, financial situation, home life or job satisfaction being universal predictors of wellbeing. The largest limitation of this previous research was a lack of appropriate control variables. Past research has shown that personality traits are powerful predictors of wellbeing, with three particularly important constructs being self-esteem, optimism and self-efficacy. Aims: The present study examined whether after controlling for positive personality traits, domain-life satisfaction relationships would vary cross-nationally and whether a direct cross-national comparison of domain-life satisfaction would reveal significant differences. It was predicted that the cross-national differences would be smaller than those found using more countries with greater cross-cultural differences. Methods: These hypotheses were tested using an online survey with samples from the USA and India, recruited using Mechanical Turk. Results: Both hypotheses were supported in that there was cross-national variation in domain-life satisfaction relationships, even after controlling for positive personality traits. In the Indian sample, health, financial and job satisfaction predicted life satisfaction. Amongst Americans, family, social life, financial situation and home satisfaction predicted it. Direct comparison revealed significant differences in the predictive power of home and job satisfaction, supporting the second hypothesis. As expected, the differences noted in this study were smaller than those revealed through our analysis of the World Values Scale and Eurobarometer. Conclusions: Domain life satisfaction relationships vary cross-nationally, even when personality traits are controlled.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幸福预测因素的跨国差异:生活领域和积极人格特质
背景:先前的研究已经证明了领域-生活满意度关系的跨国差异,健康、家庭、社会生活、个人安全、财务状况、家庭生活或工作满意度都不是幸福的普遍预测因素。先前研究的最大限制是缺乏适当的控制变量。过去的研究表明,性格特征是幸福的有力预测因素,其中三个特别重要的结构是自尊、乐观和自我效能。目的:本研究考察了在控制了积极人格特质后,领域-生活满意度关系是否会出现跨国差异,以及领域-生活满意度的直接跨国比较是否会显示出显著差异。据预测,跨国差异将小于使用更多国家和更大的跨文化差异的结果。方法:通过一项来自美国和印度的在线调查来检验这些假设,这些样本是由Mechanical Turk招募的。结果:这两个假设都得到了支持,即使在控制了积极人格特质之后,领域-生活满意度关系也存在跨国差异。在印度样本中,健康、财务和工作满意度预测了生活满意度。在美国人中,家庭、社会生活、经济状况和家庭满意度预测了这一点。直接比较显示,家庭满意度和工作满意度的预测能力存在显著差异,支持第二种假设。正如预期的那样,本研究中发现的差异小于我们对世界价值观量表和欧洲晴雨表的分析所揭示的差异。结论:即使在人格特征可控的情况下,领域生活满意度的关系也存在跨国差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Information and Communication Technology on Curriculum Delivery in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria Hotel Preferences of Customers in the Lens of Fear of Covid-19 The Generating Principle of “Symbolic Language” in the Book of Changes The Role of Electronic Applications in Transitioning and Developing the Performance of Digital Government Services: Tawakkalna Application for Covid-19 in Saudi Arabia Binge Drinking Among College Students: Trends, Consequences and Possible Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1