How to Avoid Knowledge Sabotage: A Motivational Model

Francesco Antonio Perotti, Gabriele Santoro, Pietro Calì
{"title":"How to Avoid Knowledge Sabotage: A Motivational Model","authors":"Francesco Antonio Perotti, Gabriele Santoro, Pietro Calì","doi":"10.1109/ICTMOD52902.2021.9739518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to contribute to knowledge management literature broadening our understanding of knowledge sabotage and designing a motivational framework to limit or avoid sabotage incidents in practice. In our empirical investigation, data collection takes place through online questionnaires and interviews addressed to employees and managers of heterogeneous companies. We expect to identify a negative relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to share knowledge and the phenomenon of knowledge sabotage. In the end, our conclusions will be useful to expand researchers and practitioners' awareness of the most extreme counterproductive workplace behavior that threatens the process of knowledge sharing.","PeriodicalId":154817,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD52902.2021.9739518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to contribute to knowledge management literature broadening our understanding of knowledge sabotage and designing a motivational framework to limit or avoid sabotage incidents in practice. In our empirical investigation, data collection takes place through online questionnaires and interviews addressed to employees and managers of heterogeneous companies. We expect to identify a negative relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to share knowledge and the phenomenon of knowledge sabotage. In the end, our conclusions will be useful to expand researchers and practitioners' awareness of the most extreme counterproductive workplace behavior that threatens the process of knowledge sharing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何避免知识破坏:一个激励模型
本研究的目的是为知识管理文献提供帮助,拓宽我们对知识破坏的理解,并设计一个激励框架来限制或避免实践中的破坏事件。在我们的实证调查中,数据收集是通过在线问卷调查和对异质性公司的员工和经理的访谈来进行的。我们期望找出知识分享的内在动机和外在动机与知识破坏现象之间的负相关关系。最后,我们的结论将有助于扩大研究人员和从业者对威胁知识共享过程的最极端反生产行为的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Linking Technology Management Capabilities Perspective with the Management of Technology Platforms: a literature review and preliminary framework Prediction of perishable goods deliveries by GRU neural networks for reduction of logistics costs Which online channel approach suits best for brands' strategies? An affordance perspective CSR Strategies, Investment Efficiency and Sustainable Growth Current Research Landscape of Machine Learning Algorithms in Online Identity Fraud Prediction and Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1