Uso de dispositivos (hoja McCoy vs videolaringoscopio Airtraq®) en paciente con obesidad con predictores de vía aérea difícil en cirugía general

Lorena López-Maya, Francisco Lina-Manjarrez, L. Lina-López, Laura López-Gámez
{"title":"Uso de dispositivos (hoja McCoy vs videolaringoscopio Airtraq®) en paciente con obesidad con predictores de vía aérea difícil en cirugía general","authors":"Lorena López-Maya, Francisco Lina-Manjarrez, L. Lina-López, Laura López-Gámez","doi":"10.35366/97774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A controlled, prospective, comparative, randomized, simple blind clinical trial was conducted. Objective: Determine the correlation and predictive value of the airway assessment and difficult intubation scales, obesity, McCoy sheet and Airtraq® type videolaryngoscope. Material and methods: 152 patients scheduled for surgery, with a history of obesity and risk factors for difficult ventilation and intubation under general anesthesia. Two groups were formed: group, intubation with McCoy sheet and group 2, Airtraq® videolaryngoscope. Results: In the contrast statistics of difficult ventilation, statistical significance was obtained with p < 0.05 for all factors except snoring. In predictors of difficult intubation, the Mallampati and Cormack-Lehane classification obtained p < 0.05, with sensitivity of 63 and 68% respectively, with a high negative predictive value for all factors. The average of attempts was 1 and duration 55-59 seconds, in both groups. There were not differences with the use of McCoy sheet and Airtraq®. Conclusions: Orotracheal intubation was successful in 97% of cases, thanks to the use of difficult intubation predictors and devices for managing it. Palabras clave: Predictores de vía aérea difícil, ventilación e intubación difícil, McCoy, Airtraq®.","PeriodicalId":106683,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35366/97774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A controlled, prospective, comparative, randomized, simple blind clinical trial was conducted. Objective: Determine the correlation and predictive value of the airway assessment and difficult intubation scales, obesity, McCoy sheet and Airtraq® type videolaryngoscope. Material and methods: 152 patients scheduled for surgery, with a history of obesity and risk factors for difficult ventilation and intubation under general anesthesia. Two groups were formed: group, intubation with McCoy sheet and group 2, Airtraq® videolaryngoscope. Results: In the contrast statistics of difficult ventilation, statistical significance was obtained with p < 0.05 for all factors except snoring. In predictors of difficult intubation, the Mallampati and Cormack-Lehane classification obtained p < 0.05, with sensitivity of 63 and 68% respectively, with a high negative predictive value for all factors. The average of attempts was 1 and duration 55-59 seconds, in both groups. There were not differences with the use of McCoy sheet and Airtraq®. Conclusions: Orotracheal intubation was successful in 97% of cases, thanks to the use of difficult intubation predictors and devices for managing it. Palabras clave: Predictores de vía aérea difícil, ventilación e intubación difícil, McCoy, Airtraq®.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设备(McCoy sheet vs Airtraq®videolaringoscope)在普通外科中具有困难气道预测因子的肥胖患者中的应用
采用对照、前瞻性、比较性、随机、单盲临床试验。目的:探讨气道评估与插管困难量表、肥胖、McCoy表和Airtraq®型视频喉镜的相关性和预测价值。材料与方法:152例计划手术患者,既往有肥胖史,有全麻下通气插管困难的危险因素。分为两组:McCoy片插管组和Airtraq®视频喉镜插管组。结果:在通气困难的对比统计中,除打鼾外,其他因素均有统计学意义,p < 0.05。在插管困难的预测因素中,Mallampati和Cormack-Lehane分类p < 0.05,敏感性分别为63%和68%,所有因素均具有较高的阴性预测值。两组的平均尝试次数为1次,持续时间为55-59秒。使用McCoy薄板和Airtraq®没有差异。结论:由于使用了困难的插管预测器和管理设备,97%的病例气管插管成功。Palabras clave: Predictores de vía aastrea difícil, ventilación e intubación difícil, McCoy, Airtraq®。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Morfina/ketamina versus morfina en el control del dolor postoperatorio de cirugía renal electiva Uso preoperatorio de fármacos hemostáticos para disminuir la transfusión de hemocomponentes en histerectomía total abdominal Cirugía robótica y anestesia Lidocaína en infusión transoperatoria para control de dolor: un estudio aleatorizado Medición de la fuerza muscular en adultos como predictor de extubación en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos. Revisión narrativa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1