Social Change and Development: A Critical Comparison of Classical with Contemporary Sociological Theory

I. Guclu
{"title":"Social Change and Development: A Critical Comparison of Classical with Contemporary Sociological Theory","authors":"I. Guclu","doi":"10.5430/sass.v6n2p66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study re-examines the prevalent view of classical social theorist, Auguste Comte and contemporary social theorist,Gerhard Lenski. Both social theorists are important figures in terms of social change and social development.Therefore, within context, the notion of social change theories, its relations and cause of social change are discussed,followed by an outline of the concepts of both theorists. Next, it deals with what the two perspectives share in commonand compares the differences between them. The study revealed that the two perspectives are fundamentally differentbecause Comte focused on the development of human thought while Lenski focused on social change and developmentas a result of technology. In this respect, the determinants of social change and development emerge from withinsociety itself; the deepest and the most important disagreement lies between those who see the mental or spiritualevolution of society as the main driving force of history and those who see the role of technology as its root cause.","PeriodicalId":369030,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Asian Social Science","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Asian Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/sass.v6n2p66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study re-examines the prevalent view of classical social theorist, Auguste Comte and contemporary social theorist,Gerhard Lenski. Both social theorists are important figures in terms of social change and social development.Therefore, within context, the notion of social change theories, its relations and cause of social change are discussed,followed by an outline of the concepts of both theorists. Next, it deals with what the two perspectives share in commonand compares the differences between them. The study revealed that the two perspectives are fundamentally differentbecause Comte focused on the development of human thought while Lenski focused on social change and developmentas a result of technology. In this respect, the determinants of social change and development emerge from withinsociety itself; the deepest and the most important disagreement lies between those who see the mental or spiritualevolution of society as the main driving force of history and those who see the role of technology as its root cause.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会变迁与发展:古典社会学理论与当代社会学理论的批判性比较
本研究重新审视了古典社会理论家孔德和当代社会理论家伦斯基的流行观点。两位社会理论家都是社会变革和社会发展方面的重要人物。因此,在此背景下,讨论了社会变革理论的概念,其关系和社会变革的原因,然后概述了两位理论家的概念。接下来,讨论这两种观点的共同点,并比较它们之间的差异。研究发现,孔德关注的是人类思想的发展,而伦斯基关注的是技术带来的社会变化和发展,这两种观点有着根本的不同。在这方面,社会变革和发展的决定因素来自社会本身;一些人认为社会的精神或精神进化是历史的主要驱动力,另一些人认为技术的作用是历史的根本原因,这两者之间存在着最深刻和最重要的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Cognitive Discourse Study of the US’s Cognition of China in Sino-American Strategic Competition Evaluating a Field Theory of Consciousness and Social Change: Group Practice of Transcendental Meditation and Homicide Trends Science, As a Universal Tale New Administrative Practice: The Organizational Identity Operation of Teacher Departments Social Change and Development: A Critical Comparison of Classical with Contemporary Sociological Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1