Investigating Alternates to Flexural Beams for Airport Concrete Strength Compliance

G. White, Matthew E. Johnson
{"title":"Investigating Alternates to Flexural Beams for Airport Concrete Strength Compliance","authors":"G. White, Matthew E. Johnson","doi":"10.33593/6aa8kpnf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concrete for airport rigid pavement construction is generally specified to achieve a minimum characteristic flexural strength of 4.5 MPa and acceptance testing during construction aims to verify this key design assumption. The large flexural beam specimens are cumbersome and the testing is expensive. Consequently, industry desires a more convenient test and a laboratory-based conversion to an estimated flexural strength for acceptance testing during production. This research developed and trialed a protocol for the conversion of indirect tensile strength and compressive strength to estimate the flexural strength. The laboratory correlation was encouraging. However, when trialed on a real construction project, the conversions significantly underestimated the measured flexural strength and the risk of rejecting compliant batches of concrete was significantly higher. Further research is required to understand why the reliable conversions developed in the laboratory failed in the field. This may be related to the effect of ambient temperature on 28 day flexural strength, despite the constant curing condition.","PeriodicalId":265129,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concrete Pavements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33593/6aa8kpnf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Concrete for airport rigid pavement construction is generally specified to achieve a minimum characteristic flexural strength of 4.5 MPa and acceptance testing during construction aims to verify this key design assumption. The large flexural beam specimens are cumbersome and the testing is expensive. Consequently, industry desires a more convenient test and a laboratory-based conversion to an estimated flexural strength for acceptance testing during production. This research developed and trialed a protocol for the conversion of indirect tensile strength and compressive strength to estimate the flexural strength. The laboratory correlation was encouraging. However, when trialed on a real construction project, the conversions significantly underestimated the measured flexural strength and the risk of rejecting compliant batches of concrete was significantly higher. Further research is required to understand why the reliable conversions developed in the laboratory failed in the field. This may be related to the effect of ambient temperature on 28 day flexural strength, despite the constant curing condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究机场混凝土强度符合的弯曲梁替代方案
机场刚性路面施工混凝土一般要求最小特征抗弯强度为4.5 MPa,施工过程中的验收试验旨在验证这一关键设计假设。大型受弯梁试件既繁琐又昂贵。因此,工业界需要一种更方便的测试和基于实验室的转换,以在生产期间进行验收测试的估计弯曲强度。本研究开发并试验了一种转换间接抗拉强度和抗压强度来估计抗弯强度的方案。实验室的相关性令人鼓舞。然而,当在实际建筑项目中进行试验时,转换明显低估了测量的抗弯强度,并且拒绝符合批次的混凝土的风险明显更高。需要进一步的研究来了解为什么在实验室开发的可靠转换在现场失败。这可能与环境温度对28天抗弯强度的影响有关,尽管固化条件不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity Analysis of FAARFIELD Rigid Airport Pavement Thickness Determination Guidance for Increasing the Use of Recycled Concrete Pavement Materials Performance Summary Of Precast Concrete Inlay Panel Trial In Ontario Validation Of A New Method For Determining The Remaining Service Life Of Rigid Pavements Impacts Of Flooding On Concrete Pavement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1