Comparative Analysis of Satisfaction with Course of Study among Students of Environmental Faculty/School in Nigerian Universities

W. Morenikeji, B. Ohadugha, H. Musa, G. Morenikeji
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Satisfaction with Course of Study among Students of Environmental Faculty/School in Nigerian Universities","authors":"W. Morenikeji, B. Ohadugha, H. Musa, G. Morenikeji","doi":"10.4314/etsj.v13i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the variation in the level of course of study satisfaction among the undergraduate students of the Environmental Faculty/School in some selected Nigerian tertiary institutions. The study sourced and utilised data from online survey among the participating students from the various departments under the Faculty of Environmental Technology. Survey questionnaire was designed using the Survey Menu in DATAtab statistical software and shared to students in 25 Federal, State and Private institutions across Nigeria. Responses from 1471 respondents were analysed using frequency and crosstabulations accompanied with Chi-square tests. In performing the Chi-square tests, the contributions of each Department's response were obtained to know which Department contributed most to total Chi-Square value, hence identifying the largest contributor(s) to the differences in the data. More than 80% of the students in Architecture, Building, Estate Management and Quantity Surveying were satisfied with their course, compared to around 70% of students in Urban and Regional Planning as well as Surveying and Geoinformatics. A Chi2 test carried out showed a statistically significant difference in study satisfaction among the students in the six departments (χ² (10) = 47.54, p = 0.000). URP students were the most dissatisfied. Out of the 293 dissatisfied students, 41.3% felt that their course would not provide them with good employment opportunities, while about 29% rated their course inferior to other built environment courses. It is recommended that courses in Environmental Faculty/School should be made more multi-disciplinary and injected with many cross-cutting subjects. Students should be regularly updated about the latest technology in their courses and educated about other consultancy services they can render as graduates of Built Environment. ","PeriodicalId":442092,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology and Science Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology and Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/etsj.v13i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the variation in the level of course of study satisfaction among the undergraduate students of the Environmental Faculty/School in some selected Nigerian tertiary institutions. The study sourced and utilised data from online survey among the participating students from the various departments under the Faculty of Environmental Technology. Survey questionnaire was designed using the Survey Menu in DATAtab statistical software and shared to students in 25 Federal, State and Private institutions across Nigeria. Responses from 1471 respondents were analysed using frequency and crosstabulations accompanied with Chi-square tests. In performing the Chi-square tests, the contributions of each Department's response were obtained to know which Department contributed most to total Chi-Square value, hence identifying the largest contributor(s) to the differences in the data. More than 80% of the students in Architecture, Building, Estate Management and Quantity Surveying were satisfied with their course, compared to around 70% of students in Urban and Regional Planning as well as Surveying and Geoinformatics. A Chi2 test carried out showed a statistically significant difference in study satisfaction among the students in the six departments (χ² (10) = 47.54, p = 0.000). URP students were the most dissatisfied. Out of the 293 dissatisfied students, 41.3% felt that their course would not provide them with good employment opportunities, while about 29% rated their course inferior to other built environment courses. It is recommended that courses in Environmental Faculty/School should be made more multi-disciplinary and injected with many cross-cutting subjects. Students should be regularly updated about the latest technology in their courses and educated about other consultancy services they can render as graduates of Built Environment. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚大学环境学院/学校学生对课程满意度的比较分析
本研究评估了尼日利亚一些高等院校环境学院本科生对课程学习满意度水平的变化。这项研究的数据来源和利用了来自环境技术学院各个部门的参与学生的在线调查。调查问卷是使用DATAtab统计软件中的调查菜单设计的,并分享给尼日利亚25所联邦、州和私立机构的学生。对1471名受访者的回答进行了分析,使用频率和交叉稳定期并伴有卡方检验。在执行卡方检验时,获得每个部门的响应的贡献,以了解哪个部门对总卡方值的贡献最大,从而确定对数据差异的最大贡献者。超过八成的建筑、楼宇、物业管理及工料测量专业学生对课程感到满意,而城市及区域规划、测量及地理资讯专业学生的满意程度则约为七成。经Chi2检验,6个系学生的学习满意度差异有统计学意义(χ 2 (10) = 47.54, p = 0.000)。URP学生最不满意。在293名不满意的学生中,41.3%认为他们的课程不会为他们提供良好的就业机会,而约29%认为他们的课程不如其他建筑环境课程。建议环境学院/环境学院的课程应更多元化,并注入许多交叉学科。学生应定期了解课程中的最新技术,并了解他们作为建筑环境专业毕业生可以提供的其他咨询服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are Holidays or Festive Periods to blame for Seasonal Spikes in Road Traffic Accidents in Nigeria? African Traditional Arts and Ornamentation in the Architecture of the Cultural Centre Ibadan Influence of Plastic Waste Management on the Environment: A review Post Disaster Housing Reconstruction in Lokoja-Nigeria: Major Problems Experienced and the Way Forward Analysing the Knowledge Management Culture of Construction Firms in Abuja
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1