Architecture-Instrument: The Architecture-Machine Origins and Frameworks of Machinic Line of Thinking in Architecture

D. Ćirić
{"title":"Architecture-Instrument: The Architecture-Machine Origins and Frameworks of Machinic Line of Thinking in Architecture","authors":"D. Ćirić","doi":"10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper will aim to introduce the format of the architecture-instrument as a specific spatial model for the converged architectural artistic and scientific design research and practice. This will be per formed in relation to its machinic origins or counterparts - since this form constitutes itself through different concepts of the machine variously present, applied and interpreted throughout the history within and adjacent to the architectural discipline or field of interest depending on the historical pe -riod, different machinic modalities and their attributes will be the central concern of the study. Archi-tecture-machines will be analysed in line with several criteria alongside the additional aim of tracing its genealogy and categories. Therefore, the long present machine paradigm in architecture will be challenged toward its contemporary reassessment within which possible lines of development and major features of the architecture-instrument could be inferred against the chosen references and theoretical notions. The experimental prototype exo that claimed the status of the architecture-instrument in its most advanced form - integrating sentience, algorithmic control and automation, kinetic properties, adaptability, intelligent responsiveness and interaction concerning the tracked objects, systems and environmental parameters – while also attempting to redefine and question its epistemological, methodological and technical implications, will be used as a case study that has tested some of the proposed claims, providing thereby necessary empirical evidence for the arguments. The analysed examples and sources will establish a clear outline and framework of the machinic line of thinking in architecture, enabling one thus to discern and better understand the architecture-machine/in-strument’s semantic scopes, applied forms, constitutive properties and importance along with the disciplinary and scientific-artistic integration they imply in the current moment as a continuation of its much longer traditions.","PeriodicalId":337051,"journal":{"name":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Academic Conference on Places and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18485/arh_pt.2020.7.ch54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper will aim to introduce the format of the architecture-instrument as a specific spatial model for the converged architectural artistic and scientific design research and practice. This will be per formed in relation to its machinic origins or counterparts - since this form constitutes itself through different concepts of the machine variously present, applied and interpreted throughout the history within and adjacent to the architectural discipline or field of interest depending on the historical pe -riod, different machinic modalities and their attributes will be the central concern of the study. Archi-tecture-machines will be analysed in line with several criteria alongside the additional aim of tracing its genealogy and categories. Therefore, the long present machine paradigm in architecture will be challenged toward its contemporary reassessment within which possible lines of development and major features of the architecture-instrument could be inferred against the chosen references and theoretical notions. The experimental prototype exo that claimed the status of the architecture-instrument in its most advanced form - integrating sentience, algorithmic control and automation, kinetic properties, adaptability, intelligent responsiveness and interaction concerning the tracked objects, systems and environmental parameters – while also attempting to redefine and question its epistemological, methodological and technical implications, will be used as a case study that has tested some of the proposed claims, providing thereby necessary empirical evidence for the arguments. The analysed examples and sources will establish a clear outline and framework of the machinic line of thinking in architecture, enabling one thus to discern and better understand the architecture-machine/in-strument’s semantic scopes, applied forms, constitutive properties and importance along with the disciplinary and scientific-artistic integration they imply in the current moment as a continuation of its much longer traditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑-工具:建筑学中机械思维的建筑-机器起源与框架
本文旨在介绍作为融合建筑艺术与科学设计研究与实践的具体空间模式的建筑工具的形式。这将与它的机械起源或对应物有关——因为这种形式是通过不同的机器概念构成的,在整个历史中,根据历史时期的不同,在建筑学科或感兴趣的领域内或附近,不同的机械形式及其属性将是研究的中心问题。建筑机器将根据几个标准进行分析,同时还将追踪其谱系和类别。因此,建筑中长期存在的机器范式将面临当代重新评估的挑战,其中可能的发展路线和建筑工具的主要特征可以根据所选择的参考文献和理论概念进行推断。实验原型exo以其最先进的形式宣称了建筑工具的地位-整合了感知,算法控制和自动化,动力学特性,适应性,智能响应和与跟踪对象,系统和环境参数的交互-同时也试图重新定义和质疑其认识论,方法论和技术含义。将被用作案例研究,以检验一些拟议的主张,从而为论点提供必要的经验证据。分析的例子和资料将为建筑中的机械思维线建立一个清晰的轮廓和框架,从而使人们能够辨别和更好地理解建筑-机器/仪器的语义范围、应用形式、构成属性和重要性,以及它们在当前隐含的学科和科学-艺术整合,作为其悠久传统的延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preserving the Material Authenticity: A Method of Preserving the Truth Application of Veneer Based Panels in Exoskeleton Architecture Origin of Citizens and Impact on City Design of Cultural Trails — As a Result of Belgrade’s Green Infrastructure Concept Sustainable Urban Development by Means of Green Walls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1