Laboratory evaluation of shear bond strength of three different bonding systems for orthodontic brackets

Ahmed R. Elkalza, D. Mostafa
{"title":"Laboratory evaluation of shear bond strength of three different bonding systems for orthodontic brackets","authors":"Ahmed R. Elkalza, D. Mostafa","doi":"10.21608/eos.2018.77121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three different types of bonding systems for orthodontic brackets to tooth surface. Materials and Methods: Sixty sound premolar teeth divided randomly into three groups of 20 each. In group A, the brackets were bonded using conventional etch system. In group B, brackets were bonded using self-etch primer system, while in group C, brackets were bonded using one step adhesive system. Premolar teeth were mounted with cold acrylic resin in metallic mold and brackets were shear tested to failure using universal testing machine recorded in Newton for all specimens. Results: Group C shows significantly higher value of shear bond strength in comparison to groups A and B, while there was no significant difference between group A and B. Conclusion: Orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel surface using one-step bonding system (GC ortho connect) without primer was significantly higher than brackets bonded using conventional or self-etch systems.","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2018.77121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three different types of bonding systems for orthodontic brackets to tooth surface. Materials and Methods: Sixty sound premolar teeth divided randomly into three groups of 20 each. In group A, the brackets were bonded using conventional etch system. In group B, brackets were bonded using self-etch primer system, while in group C, brackets were bonded using one step adhesive system. Premolar teeth were mounted with cold acrylic resin in metallic mold and brackets were shear tested to failure using universal testing machine recorded in Newton for all specimens. Results: Group C shows significantly higher value of shear bond strength in comparison to groups A and B, while there was no significant difference between group A and B. Conclusion: Orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel surface using one-step bonding system (GC ortho connect) without primer was significantly higher than brackets bonded using conventional or self-etch systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正畸托槽三种不同粘结体系剪切粘结强度的实验室评价
目的:本研究的目的是评估三种不同类型的粘接系统的正畸托槽与牙表面的剪切粘接强度。材料与方法:60颗正常的前磨牙随机分为3组,每组20颗。在A组中,使用常规蚀刻系统粘合支架。B组支架采用自蚀刻底漆系统粘接,C组支架采用一步粘结系统粘接。前磨牙用冷丙烯酸树脂固定在金属模具中,托槽使用牛顿通用试验机进行剪切试验至失效。结果:C组与A、B组相比,剪切结合强度值明显高于A、B组,而A、B组之间无显著差异。结论:无底物的一步粘结系统(GC ortho connect)与牙釉质表面粘结的正畸托槽明显高于常规或自蚀系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison Of Different Imaging Software For Measuring Volume Of The Maxillary Sinus Splint-Supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device Versus Class II Intermaxillary elastics For The Correction Of Class II Malocclusion ; A Retrospective Study Effect Of White Spot Lesion Pretreatment With Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared To Diode Laser On The Shear Bond Strength Of Orthodontic Brackets. An In-Vitro Study Association Of Soft Tissue Facial Form & Dental Arch Form: A Cross Sectional Comparative Study Association Of Molar Angulation With Anterior Crowding And Dental Inclinations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1