Inside the Black Box: The Effect of TMT Strategic Consensus on Firm Performance

Sicheng Luo
{"title":"Inside the Black Box: The Effect of TMT Strategic Consensus on Firm Performance","authors":"Sicheng Luo","doi":"10.33422/conferenceme.2019.11.646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The premise stances underlying most of strategic consensus studies is that a higher extent of consensus leads to advantageous firm performance. However, empirical outcomes have been mixed and inconsistent. The author accounts for this conundrum using a mechanism analysis. Results based on sample of manufacturing companies in Taiwan reveal that the direct relationship between top management team (TMT) strategic consensus and firm performance is negative, whereas by through decision quality, TMT strategic consensus can facilitate organizational probability. Our finding provides am alternative explanation for prior inconsistencies and points to the need for a mediation of decision-making practice to better understand consensus-performance relationship. The present research also add value to upper-echelons theory by examining the proverbial black box as to how executive decision process is transferred into firm-level outcome.","PeriodicalId":288817,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Academic Conference on Management and Economics","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Academic Conference on Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/conferenceme.2019.11.646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The premise stances underlying most of strategic consensus studies is that a higher extent of consensus leads to advantageous firm performance. However, empirical outcomes have been mixed and inconsistent. The author accounts for this conundrum using a mechanism analysis. Results based on sample of manufacturing companies in Taiwan reveal that the direct relationship between top management team (TMT) strategic consensus and firm performance is negative, whereas by through decision quality, TMT strategic consensus can facilitate organizational probability. Our finding provides am alternative explanation for prior inconsistencies and points to the need for a mediation of decision-making practice to better understand consensus-performance relationship. The present research also add value to upper-echelons theory by examining the proverbial black box as to how executive decision process is transferred into firm-level outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑箱内部:TMT战略共识对企业绩效的影响
大多数战略共识研究的前提立场是,更高程度的共识导致有利的公司绩效。然而,经验结果是混合和不一致的。作者用机制分析来解释这个难题。基于台湾制造业企业样本的研究结果显示,高层管理团队战略共识与企业绩效呈负相关,而高层管理团队战略共识通过决策质量对组织概率有促进作用。我们的发现为先前的不一致提供了另一种解释,并指出需要对决策实践进行调解,以更好地理解共识-绩效关系。本研究还通过检验众所周知的黑盒理论来增加上层理论的价值,即执行决策过程如何转化为公司层面的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Waste to Energy Technology Management, the most sustainable and efficient Waste Management approach in the Sub-Saharan Africa: Case Study of Cosmopolitan Regions Perception of Company Leaders on opportunities and Challenges of Integrated Reporting in India A Study of Factors Affecting Customers’ Satisfaction: – A Case Study of Counterfeit Luxury Brands of the Millennium E-Commerce Disruption: Impact and Challenges Going forward Inside the Black Box: The Effect of TMT Strategic Consensus on Firm Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1