Outside the Walls with Phaedrus

Arnaud Macé
{"title":"Outside the Walls with Phaedrus","authors":"Arnaud Macé","doi":"10.1163/9789004446779_015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, Arnaud Mace analyses Derrida’s complex reading of Plato’s Phaedrus in detail. Derrida sought to locate the structure upon which the history of philosophy in his view rests, a structure he terms “phonocentrism” or “logocentrism,” in the very activity of reading texts passed on to us from ancient Greek thinkers. Nowhere is such a structure more thoroughly integrated than in Plato’s Phaedrus, and the only way to uncover it is to read the Phaedrus as a whole and write down the experience of reading it, as Derrida does in Plato’s Pharmacy. In this chapter, Arnaud Mace endeavors to read Derrida’s Pharmacy, uncovering three layers in its reading of the Phaedrus, which provides a successively deeper understanding of the structure of logocentrism. The first layer is concerned with finding the thread that unifies the whole dialogue in the opposition between writing and true knowledge expressed in live speech; the second finds that Plato deconstructed this first opposition by conceiving true knowledge through metaphors of writing and by building his ontology on a grammatical scheme; the third shows how Plato’s writing proves that a trial against writing is needed in order to discover the nature of the text as forever differentiating the many layers of its meaning and prompting the desire for it. Derrida’s Pharmacy, Mace argues, is nothing but a reading of the Phaedrus that lets the dialogue unfold the very structure of metaphysics that is enshrined in it.","PeriodicalId":381359,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenological Interpretations of Ancient Philosophy","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenological Interpretations of Ancient Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446779_015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, Arnaud Mace analyses Derrida’s complex reading of Plato’s Phaedrus in detail. Derrida sought to locate the structure upon which the history of philosophy in his view rests, a structure he terms “phonocentrism” or “logocentrism,” in the very activity of reading texts passed on to us from ancient Greek thinkers. Nowhere is such a structure more thoroughly integrated than in Plato’s Phaedrus, and the only way to uncover it is to read the Phaedrus as a whole and write down the experience of reading it, as Derrida does in Plato’s Pharmacy. In this chapter, Arnaud Mace endeavors to read Derrida’s Pharmacy, uncovering three layers in its reading of the Phaedrus, which provides a successively deeper understanding of the structure of logocentrism. The first layer is concerned with finding the thread that unifies the whole dialogue in the opposition between writing and true knowledge expressed in live speech; the second finds that Plato deconstructed this first opposition by conceiving true knowledge through metaphors of writing and by building his ontology on a grammatical scheme; the third shows how Plato’s writing proves that a trial against writing is needed in order to discover the nature of the text as forever differentiating the many layers of its meaning and prompting the desire for it. Derrida’s Pharmacy, Mace argues, is nothing but a reading of the Phaedrus that lets the dialogue unfold the very structure of metaphysics that is enshrined in it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
和费德鲁斯在城墙外
在本章中,Arnaud Mace详细分析了德里达对柏拉图《费德鲁斯篇》的复杂解读。德里达试图在阅读古希腊思想家传递给我们的文本的活动中,找到他认为哲学史所依赖的结构,一种他称之为“音中心主义”或“意义中心主义”的结构。在柏拉图的《费德鲁斯篇》中,没有比这更完整的结构了,而发现它的唯一方法就是把《费德鲁斯篇》作为一个整体来阅读并写下阅读的经历,就像德里达在柏拉图的《药剂学》中所做的那样。在本章中,梅斯试图解读德里达的《药剂学》,揭示了其对《费德鲁斯篇》的解读中的三个层次,从而对逻各斯中心主义的结构有了更深入的理解。第一层关注的是在写作和真实的言语表达之间的对立中找到统一整个对话的线索;第二种观点认为柏拉图解构了第一种对立,他通过文字的隐喻来构思真正的知识,并在语法图式上建立他的本体论;第三章展示了柏拉图的作品如何证明,为了发现文本的本质,需要对写作进行审判,因为它永远区分了它的许多层次,并激发了对它的渴望。梅斯认为,德里达的《药剂》不过是对《费德鲁斯篇》的一种解读,它让对话展现了其中所蕴含的形而上学的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outside the Walls with Phaedrus Speaking Being Phenomenology and Ancient Greek Philosophy Jan Patočka on Plato’s Conception of the Soul as Self-Motion Dialectic as a Way of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1