Against Ethical AI

Donald Mcmillan, Barry A. T. Brown
{"title":"Against Ethical AI","authors":"Donald Mcmillan, Barry A. T. Brown","doi":"10.1145/3363384.3363393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we use the EU guidelines on ethical AI, and the responses to it, as a starting point to discuss the problems with our community’s focus on such manifestos, principles, and sets of guidelines. We cover how industry and academia are at times complicit in ‘Ethics Washing’, how developing guidelines carries the risk of diluting our rights in practice, and downplaying the role of our own self interest. We conclude by discussing briefly the role of technical practice in ethics.","PeriodicalId":281851,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this paper we use the EU guidelines on ethical AI, and the responses to it, as a starting point to discuss the problems with our community’s focus on such manifestos, principles, and sets of guidelines. We cover how industry and academia are at times complicit in ‘Ethics Washing’, how developing guidelines carries the risk of diluting our rights in practice, and downplaying the role of our own self interest. We conclude by discussing briefly the role of technical practice in ethics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对道德AI
在本文中,我们使用欧盟关于道德人工智能的指导方针,以及对它的回应,作为起点,讨论我们社区关注这些宣言、原则和指导方针的问题。我们讨论了工业界和学术界如何在“道德清洗”中合谋,制定指导方针如何在实践中承担稀释我们权利的风险,以及淡化我们自身利益的作用。最后,我们简要地讨论了技术实践在伦理学中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Entangled Ethnography: Towards a collective future understanding Imagining the Cool-ag: Or, Freedom Considered Harmful 5 Percent Piano: An Augmented Piano with Playful Audio Response Exploring the Sensed and Unexpected: Not Looking in Gaze Interaction Towards a Network of Practices: Identifying Central Elements to Inform Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1