Urgensi Penerapan Omnibus law Untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Pembentukan Regulasi Di Indonesia

Roman Situngkir, beberapa masalah seperti
{"title":"Urgensi Penerapan Omnibus law Untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Pembentukan Regulasi Di Indonesia","authors":"Roman Situngkir, beberapa masalah seperti","doi":"10.55357/is.v3i1.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of omnibus law as a mechanism to overcome regulatory obstacles due to too many (hyper regulation) and overlapping (overlapping) existing regulations. This mechanism is essentially something new and can act as a breakthrough for the reformulation of the preparation of laws and regulations in Indonesia. This normative legal to type and nature of the research, data used are secondary data consisting of primary legal legal materials of books, journals, scientific works, and articles explanations about the law. primary material. The nature of this research is descriptive analytical. As for what is meant by descriptive analytical research is a research that can describe in and systematically about the object under study. Primary legal materials are legal materials that or make the public understandable, including legal products that are the subject of study and legal products as tools for forming critical law. Secondary legal materials include explanations of primary legal materials in the form of expert doctrine found in books, journals, and websites. The results show that the main characteristic of omnibus law in the United States is that it helps parliamentarians to form consensus. This is because every member of parliament has the to attach his draft law to the omnibus law. So the application of omnibus law is more of a political style or motive to smooth the passage of a bill into law, while the main characteristic of omnibus law in Turkey is a political motive or style to speed up and shorten the legislative process by using other auxiliary methods. There is no difference in the legislative process between those proposed by the government and those proposed by members of parliament as in Turkey. it goes into the extent to which the urgency of implementing the omnibus law in solving the problems of the formation of regulations in Indonesia can be seen that are several problems such as: a) hyper regulation, b) inharmonious regulation and overlapping.","PeriodicalId":437261,"journal":{"name":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v3i1.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of omnibus law as a mechanism to overcome regulatory obstacles due to too many (hyper regulation) and overlapping (overlapping) existing regulations. This mechanism is essentially something new and can act as a breakthrough for the reformulation of the preparation of laws and regulations in Indonesia. This normative legal to type and nature of the research, data used are secondary data consisting of primary legal legal materials of books, journals, scientific works, and articles explanations about the law. primary material. The nature of this research is descriptive analytical. As for what is meant by descriptive analytical research is a research that can describe in and systematically about the object under study. Primary legal materials are legal materials that or make the public understandable, including legal products that are the subject of study and legal products as tools for forming critical law. Secondary legal materials include explanations of primary legal materials in the form of expert doctrine found in books, journals, and websites. The results show that the main characteristic of omnibus law in the United States is that it helps parliamentarians to form consensus. This is because every member of parliament has the to attach his draft law to the omnibus law. So the application of omnibus law is more of a political style or motive to smooth the passage of a bill into law, while the main characteristic of omnibus law in Turkey is a political motive or style to speed up and shorten the legislative process by using other auxiliary methods. There is no difference in the legislative process between those proposed by the government and those proposed by members of parliament as in Turkey. it goes into the extent to which the urgency of implementing the omnibus law in solving the problems of the formation of regulations in Indonesia can be seen that are several problems such as: a) hyper regulation, b) inharmonious regulation and overlapping.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Omnibus law的紧急应用是解决印尼监管机构成立问题
利用综合法作为一种机制来克服由于过多(过度监管)和重叠(重叠)现有法规而造成的监管障碍。这一机制本质上是一种新的东西,可以作为印度尼西亚重新拟订法律和条例的突破口。这种规范性的法律研究的类型和性质,使用的数据是次要数据,包括主要的法律法律材料的书籍,期刊,科学著作和文章解释的法律。主要材料。本研究的性质是描述性分析。描述性分析研究是指对研究对象进行系统描述的研究。初级法律资料是使公众能够理解的法律资料,包括作为研究对象的法律产品和作为形成批判法的工具的法律产品。辅助法律资料包括以专家学说的形式在书籍、期刊和网站上对主要法律资料的解释。结果表明,美国综合法的主要特点是有利于国会议员形成共识。这是因为每个国会议员都有权将他的法律草案附在综合法上。因此,综合法的适用更多的是一种使法案顺利通过成为法律的政治风格或政治动机,而土耳其综合法的主要特点是一种利用其他辅助手段加快和缩短立法过程的政治动机或政治风格。在土耳其,政府提出的立法程序与国会议员提出的立法程序没有区别。从实施综合法解决印尼规制形成问题的紧迫性可以看出:a)规制过度,b)规制不协调,重叠等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Perikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) dalam Kegiatan Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Tinjauan Yuridis Kerugian Negara Dalam Kerja Sama Operasional (KSO) Investasi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Yayasan Yang Didirikan Oleh BUMN (Studi Kasus Yayasan Bapelkes Krakatau Steel) Urgensi Penerapan Omnibus law Untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Pembentukan Regulasi Di Indonesia Kedudukan Hukum Pria Yang Melakukan Perkawinan Nyentana Sebagai Ahli Waris Dalam Hukum Waris Adat Masyarakat Bali (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2991K/PDT/2015) Perspektif Kesejahteraan Tenagakerja Dengan Model Penetapan Upah Minimum Kabupaten Kota
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1