Secondhand Conspiracy Theories: The Social, Emotional and Political Tolls on Loved Ones of QAnon Followers

S. Moskalenko, B. Burton, J. Fernández-Garayzábal González, M. M. Bloom
{"title":"Secondhand Conspiracy Theories: The Social, Emotional and Political Tolls on Loved Ones of QAnon Followers","authors":"S. Moskalenko, B. Burton, J. Fernández-Garayzábal González, M. M. Bloom","doi":"10.1080/17419166.2022.2111305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT QAnon is a set of conspiracy theories that originated online in 2017 and achieved a sizable following in the U.S. and around the world. QAnon’s viral disinformation contributed to violent crimes committed by QAnon followers based on their conspiratorial beliefs, as well as to participation of some QAnon followers in the January 6th attack on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, and to widespread COVID vaccine hesitancy and rejection among believers. This paper presents a to-date unexplored additional cost of conspiracy beliefs: the emotional, social and political toll a relationship with QAnon followers can have on their loved ones. In an Internet survey of 288 U.S.-based participants, a majority (80%) reported having a QAnon-following family member or friend. These relationships have suffered as a result of the loved one’s conspiratorial beliefs, leading to self-reported emotional distress and reevaluation of participants’ views of the government and society. Participants with a QAnon loved one reported higher anxiety and PTSD than those without such connection. On average, participants viewed QAnon as significantly more radical (willing to engage in illegal or violent acts) than themselves. Perceived QAnon radicalization was predicted by own anxiety and by relationship deterioration with QAnon loved one. The discussion focuses on the importance of tracking these secondhand effects of conspiracy theories as drivers of political polarization.","PeriodicalId":375529,"journal":{"name":"Democracy and Security","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democracy and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2022.2111305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT QAnon is a set of conspiracy theories that originated online in 2017 and achieved a sizable following in the U.S. and around the world. QAnon’s viral disinformation contributed to violent crimes committed by QAnon followers based on their conspiratorial beliefs, as well as to participation of some QAnon followers in the January 6th attack on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, and to widespread COVID vaccine hesitancy and rejection among believers. This paper presents a to-date unexplored additional cost of conspiracy beliefs: the emotional, social and political toll a relationship with QAnon followers can have on their loved ones. In an Internet survey of 288 U.S.-based participants, a majority (80%) reported having a QAnon-following family member or friend. These relationships have suffered as a result of the loved one’s conspiratorial beliefs, leading to self-reported emotional distress and reevaluation of participants’ views of the government and society. Participants with a QAnon loved one reported higher anxiety and PTSD than those without such connection. On average, participants viewed QAnon as significantly more radical (willing to engage in illegal or violent acts) than themselves. Perceived QAnon radicalization was predicted by own anxiety and by relationship deterioration with QAnon loved one. The discussion focuses on the importance of tracking these secondhand effects of conspiracy theories as drivers of political polarization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二手阴谋论:对QAnon追随者的亲人的社会、情感和政治代价
QAnon是一组阴谋论,起源于2017年的网络,并在美国和世界各地获得了可观的追随者。QAnon病毒式传播的虚假信息导致了QAnon追随者基于阴谋论信仰犯下的暴力犯罪,以及一些QAnon追随者参与了1月6日对华盛顿国会山的袭击,以及信徒中普遍存在的COVID疫苗犹豫和拒绝。这篇论文提出了迄今为止未被探索的阴谋信仰的额外成本:与QAnon追随者的关系可能对他们所爱的人造成情感、社会和政治上的损失。在一项针对288名美国人的网络调查中,大多数人(80%)表示有一个qanon追随者的家人或朋友。这些关系由于所爱之人的阴谋论信仰而受到损害,导致自我报告的情绪困扰,并重新评估参与者对政府和社会的看法。与没有这种关系的人相比,有QAnon亲人的参与者报告了更高的焦虑和创伤后应激障碍。平均而言,参与者认为QAnon比他们自己激进得多(愿意从事非法或暴力行为)。QAnon激进化的感知是由自身的焦虑和与QAnon爱人的关系恶化所预测的。讨论的重点是追踪阴谋论作为政治两极分化驱动因素的这些二手影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the India-China Border: The Enduring Threat of War in the High Himalayas Understanding the India-China Border: The Enduring Threat of War in the High Himalayas , Manoj Joshi, India, Harper Collins, 2022, 312 pp., £. 599, ISBN 109394407723 (Hardback). Geopolitics and Democracy: The Western Liberal Order from Foundation to Fracture Geopolitics and Democracy: The Western Liberal Order from Foundation to Fracture by Peter Trubowitz and Brian Burgoon, New York: Oxford University Press, 2023, 272 pp., $99 (Hardcover), ISBN: 9780197535400 The Perils of Ethio-Eritrea Rapprochement: A Critical Appraisal Insurgent Terrorism: Intergroup Relationships and the Killing of Civilians Insurgent Terrorism: Intergroup Relationships and the Killing of Civilians , Asal, Victor, Brian J. Phillips and R. Karl Rethemeyer, : Oxford University Press, 2022, 256 pp., (paperback), ISBN 9780197607046, ISBN 9780197607 Moderating the Effect of Risk Factors: The Influence of Social Support on the Willingness to Support Violence Among Norwegian Youth and Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1